Cognitive function based on theta-gamma coupling vs. clinical diagnosis in older adults with mild cognitive impairment with or without major depressive disorder
-
Published:2024-03-19
Issue:1
Volume:14
Page:
-
ISSN:2158-3188
-
Container-title:Translational Psychiatry
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Transl Psychiatry
Author:
Brooks Heather, Wang Wei, Zomorrodi Reza, Blumberger Daniel M.ORCID, Bowie Christopher R., Daskalakis Zafiris J., Fischer Corinne E., Flint Alastair J., Herrmann Nathan, Kumar Sanjeev, Lanctôt Krista L., Mah Linda, Mulsant Benoit H.ORCID, Pollock Bruce G., Voineskos Aristotle N.ORCID, Rajji Tarek K.ORCID, , Mulsant Benoit H., Rajji Tarek K., Herrmann Nathan, Pollock Bruce G., Blumberger Daniel M., Bowie Christopher R., Butters Meryl A., Fischer Corinne E., Flint Alastair J., Golas Angela, Graff Ariel, Kennedy James L., Kumar Sanjeev, Lanctôt Krista L., Lourenco Lillian, Mah Linda, Ovaysikia Shima, Rapoport Mark, Thorpe Kevin E., Verhoeff Nicolaas P. L. G., Voineskos Aristotle
Abstract
AbstractWhether individuals with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and a history of major depressive disorder (MDD) are at a higher risk for cognitive decline than those with MCI alone is still not clear. Previous work suggests that a reduction in prefrontal cortical theta phase-gamma amplitude coupling (TGC) is an early marker of cognitive impairment. This study aimed to determine whether using a TGC cutoff is better at separating individuals with MCI or MCI with remitted MDD (MCI+rMDD) on cognitive performance than their clinical diagnosis. Our hypothesis was that global cognition would differ more between TGC-based groups than diagnostic groups. We analyzed data from 128 MCI (mean age: 71.8, SD: 7.3) and 85 MCI+rMDD (mean age: 70.9, SD: 4.7) participants. Participants completed a comprehensive neuropsychological battery; TGC was measured during the N-back task. An optimal TGC cutoff was determined during the performance of the 2-back. This TGC cutoff was used to classify participants into low vs. high-TGC groups. We then compared Cohen’s d of the difference in global cognition between the high and low TGC groups to Cohen’s d between the MCI and MCI+rMDD groups. We used bootstrapping to determine 95% confidence intervals for Cohen’s d values using the whole sample. As hypothesized, Cohen’s d for the difference in global cognition between the TGC groups was larger (0.64 [0.32, 0.88]) than between the diagnostic groups (0.10 [0.004, 0.37]) with a difference between these two Cohen’s d’s of 0.54 [0.10, 0.80]. Our findings suggest that TGC is a useful marker to identify individuals at high risk for cognitive decline, beyond clinical diagnosis. This could be due to TGC being a sensitive marker of prefrontal cortical dysfunction that would lead to an accelerated cognitive decline.
Funder
Fondation Brain Canada Canada Foundation for Innovation Gouvernement du Canada | Canadian Institutes of Health Research Ontario Ministry of Research, Innovation and Science
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference50 articles.
1. Petersen RC, Smith GE, Waring SC, Ivnik RJ, Tangalos EG, Kokmen E. Mild cognitive impairment: clinical characterization and outcome. Arch Neurol. 1999;56:303–8. 2. Petersen RC. Mild cognitive impairment as a diagnostic entity. J Intern Med. 2004;256:183–94. 3. Panza F, Frisardi V, Capurso C, D’Introno A, Colacicco AM, Imbimbo BP, et al. Late-life depression, mild cognitive impairment, and dementia: possible continuum?. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2010;18:98–116. 4. Steenland K, Karnes C, Seals R, Carnevale C, Hermida A, Levey A. Late-life depression as a risk factor for mild cognitive impairment or Alzheimer’s disease in 30 US Alzheimer’s disease centers. J Alzheimers Dis. 2012;31:265–75. 5. Duffy SL, Paradise M, Hickie IB, Lewis SJ, Naismith SL, Lagopoulos J. Cognitive impairment with and without depression history: an analysis of white matter microstructure. J Psychiatry Neurosci. 2014;39:135.
|
|