Cognitive function based on theta-gamma coupling vs. clinical diagnosis in older adults with mild cognitive impairment with or without major depressive disorder

Author:

Brooks Heather,Wang Wei,Zomorrodi Reza,Blumberger Daniel M.ORCID,Bowie Christopher R.,Daskalakis Zafiris J.,Fischer Corinne E.,Flint Alastair J.,Herrmann Nathan,Kumar Sanjeev,Lanctôt Krista L.,Mah Linda,Mulsant Benoit H.ORCID,Pollock Bruce G.,Voineskos Aristotle N.ORCID,Rajji Tarek K.ORCID, ,Mulsant Benoit H.,Rajji Tarek K.,Herrmann Nathan,Pollock Bruce G.,Blumberger Daniel M.,Bowie Christopher R.,Butters Meryl A.,Fischer Corinne E.,Flint Alastair J.,Golas Angela,Graff Ariel,Kennedy James L.,Kumar Sanjeev,Lanctôt Krista L.,Lourenco Lillian,Mah Linda,Ovaysikia Shima,Rapoport Mark,Thorpe Kevin E.,Verhoeff Nicolaas P. L. G.,Voineskos Aristotle

Abstract

AbstractWhether individuals with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and a history of major depressive disorder (MDD) are at a higher risk for cognitive decline than those with MCI alone is still not clear. Previous work suggests that a reduction in prefrontal cortical theta phase-gamma amplitude coupling (TGC) is an early marker of cognitive impairment. This study aimed to determine whether using a TGC cutoff is better at separating individuals with MCI or MCI with remitted MDD (MCI+rMDD) on cognitive performance than their clinical diagnosis. Our hypothesis was that global cognition would differ more between TGC-based groups than diagnostic groups. We analyzed data from 128 MCI (mean age: 71.8, SD: 7.3) and 85 MCI+rMDD (mean age: 70.9, SD: 4.7) participants. Participants completed a comprehensive neuropsychological battery; TGC was measured during the N-back task. An optimal TGC cutoff was determined during the performance of the 2-back. This TGC cutoff was used to classify participants into low vs. high-TGC groups. We then compared Cohen’s d of the difference in global cognition between the high and low TGC groups to Cohen’s d between the MCI and MCI+rMDD groups. We used bootstrapping to determine 95% confidence intervals for Cohen’s d values using the whole sample. As hypothesized, Cohen’s d for the difference in global cognition between the TGC groups was larger (0.64 [0.32, 0.88]) than between the diagnostic groups (0.10 [0.004, 0.37]) with a difference between these two Cohen’s d’s of 0.54 [0.10, 0.80]. Our findings suggest that TGC is a useful marker to identify individuals at high risk for cognitive decline, beyond clinical diagnosis. This could be due to TGC being a sensitive marker of prefrontal cortical dysfunction that would lead to an accelerated cognitive decline.

Funder

Fondation Brain Canada

Canada Foundation for Innovation

Gouvernement du Canada | Canadian Institutes of Health Research

Ontario Ministry of Research, Innovation and Science

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3