Predictors of diagnostic transition from major depressive disorder to bipolar disorder: a retrospective observational network study

Author:

Nestsiarovich Anastasiya,Reps Jenna M.,Matheny Michael E.ORCID,DuVall Scott L.,Lynch Kristine E.,Beaton Maura,Jiang Xinzhuo,Spotnitz MatthewORCID,Pfohl Stephen R.,Shah Nigam H.ORCID,Torre Carmen Olga,Reich Christian G.,Lee Dong YunORCID,Son Sang JoonORCID,You Seng ChanORCID,Park Rae WoongORCID,Ryan Patrick B.,Lambert Christophe G.ORCID

Abstract

AbstractMany patients with bipolar disorder (BD) are initially misdiagnosed with major depressive disorder (MDD) and are treated with antidepressants, whose potential iatrogenic effects are widely discussed. It is unknown whether MDD is a comorbidity of BD or its earlier stage, and no consensus exists on individual conversion predictors, delaying BD’s timely recognition and treatment. We aimed to build a predictive model of MDD to BD conversion and to validate it across a multi-national network of patient databases using the standardization afforded by the Observational Medical Outcomes Partnership (OMOP) common data model. Five “training” US databases were retrospectively analyzed: IBM MarketScan CCAE, MDCR, MDCD, Optum EHR, and Optum Claims. Cyclops regularized logistic regression models were developed on one-year MDD-BD conversion with all standard covariates from the HADES PatientLevelPrediction package. Time-to-conversion Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed up to a decade after MDD, stratified by model-estimated risk. External validation of the final prediction model was performed across 9 patient record databases within the Observational Health Data Sciences and Informatics (OHDSI) network internationally. The model’s area under the curve (AUC) varied 0.633–0.745 (µ = 0.689) across the five US training databases. Nine variables predicted one-year MDD-BD transition. Factors that increased risk were: younger age, severe depression, psychosis, anxiety, substance misuse, self-harm thoughts/actions, and prior mental disorder. AUCs of the validation datasets ranged 0.570–0.785 (µ = 0.664). An assessment algorithm was built for MDD to BD conversion that allows distinguishing as much as 100-fold risk differences among patients and validates well across multiple international data sources.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Biological Psychiatry,Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience,Psychiatry and Mental health

Reference34 articles.

1. GBD. Disease and Injury Incidence and Prevalence Collaborators. Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 354 diseases and injuries for 195 countries and territories, 1990-2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet. 2018;392:1789–858. 2017

2. National Institute of Mental Health. NIMH » Major Depression. https://www.nimh.nih.gov/health/statistics/major-depression.shtml (accessed 11 Feb 2020).

3. National Alliance on Mental Illness. Mental Health By the Numbers. https://www.nami.org/learn-more/mental-health-by-the-numbers (accessed 11 Feb 2020).

4. WHO, World Health Organization. The ICD-10 classification of mental and behavioural disorders: diagnostic criteria for research. World Health Organization; 1993.

5. Fagiolini A, Cuomo A. On the centrality of mixed features in mood disorders: listening to Kraepelin and Weygandt and moving forward. Bipolar Disord. 2017;19:704–5.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3