Machine-learning classification using neuroimaging data in schizophrenia, autism, ultra-high risk and first-episode psychosis
-
Published:2020-08-17
Issue:1
Volume:10
Page:
-
ISSN:2158-3188
-
Container-title:Translational Psychiatry
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Transl Psychiatry
Author:
Yassin Walid, Nakatani Hironori, Zhu Yinghan, Kojima Masaki, Owada Keiho, Kuwabara Hitoshi, Gonoi WataruORCID, Aoki YutaORCID, Takao Hidemasa, Natsubori TatsunobuORCID, Iwashiro Norichika, Kasai Kiyoto, Kano Yukiko, Abe Osamu, Yamasue Hidenori, Koike ShinsukeORCID
Abstract
AbstractNeuropsychiatric disorders are diagnosed based on behavioral criteria, which makes the diagnosis challenging. Objective biomarkers such as neuroimaging are needed, and when coupled with machine learning, can assist the diagnostic decision and increase its reliability. Sixty-four schizophrenia, 36 autism spectrum disorder (ASD), and 106 typically developing individuals were analyzed. FreeSurfer was used to obtain the data from the participant’s brain scans. Six classifiers were utilized to classify the subjects. Subsequently, 26 ultra-high risk for psychosis (UHR) and 17 first-episode psychosis (FEP) subjects were run through the trained classifiers. Lastly, the classifiers’ output of the patient groups was correlated with their clinical severity. All six classifiers performed relatively well to distinguish the subject groups, especially support vector machine (SVM) and Logistic regression (LR). Cortical thickness and subcortical volume feature groups were most useful for the classification. LR and SVM were highly consistent with clinical indices of ASD. When UHR and FEP groups were run with the trained classifiers, majority of the cases were classified as schizophrenia, none as ASD. Overall, SVM and LR were the best performing classifiers. Cortical thickness and subcortical volume were most useful for the classification, compared to surface area. LR, SVM, and DT’s output were clinically informative. The trained classifiers were able to help predict the diagnostic category of both UHR and FEP Individuals.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Biological Psychiatry,Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience,Psychiatry and Mental health
Reference62 articles.
1. Aboraya, A., Rankin, E., France, C., El-Missiry, A. & John, C. The reliability of psychiatric diagnosis revisited: the clinician’s guide to improve the reliability of psychiatric diagnosis. Psychiatry 3, 41–50 (2006). 2. Ward, C. H., Beck, A. T., Mendelson, M., Mock, J. E. & Erbaugh, J. K. The psychiatric nomenclature. Reasons for diagnostic disagreement. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 7, 198–205 (1962). 3. Greenstein, D., Malley, J. D., Weisinger, B., Clasen, L. & Gogtay, N. Using multivariate machine learning methods and structural MRI to classify childhood onset schizophrenia and healthy controls. Front. Psychiatry 3, 53 (2012). 4. Libero, L. E., DeRamus, T. P., Lahti, A. C., Deshpande, G. & Kana, R. K. Multimodal neuroimaging based classification of autism spectrum disorder using anatomical, neurochemical, and white matter correlates. Cortex 66, 46–59 (2015). 5. Orru, G., Pettersson-Yeo, W., Marquand, A. F., Sartori, G. & Mechelli, A. Using Support Vector Machine to identify imaging biomarkers of neurological and psychiatric disease: a critical review. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 36, 1140–1152 (2012).
Cited by
84 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|