Abstract
AbstractPeople rely on well-functioning ecosystems to provide critical services that underpin human health and well-being. Consequently, biodiversity loss has profound negative implications for humanity. Human–biodiversity interactions can deliver individual-level well-being gains, equating to substantial healthcare cost savings when scaled up across populations. However, critical questions remain about which species and/or traits (for example, colours, sounds and smells) elicit well-being responses. The traits that influence well-being can be considered ‘effect’ traits. Using techniques from community ecology, we have analysed a database of species’ effect traits articulated by people to identify those that generate different types of well-being (physical, emotional, cognitive, social, spiritual and ‘global’ well-being, the latter being akin to ‘whole-person health’). Effect traits have a predominately positive impact on well-being, influenced by the identity and taxonomic kingdom of each species. Different sets of effect traits deliver different types of well-being. However, traits cannot be considered independently of species because multiple traits can be supported by a single species. Indeed, we have found that numerous effect traits from across the ecological community can elicit multiple types of well-being, illustrating the complexity of biodiversity experiences. Our empirical approach can help to implement interdisciplinary thinking for biodiversity conservation and nature-based public health interventions designed to support human well-being.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Nature and Landscape Conservation,Urban Studies,Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment,Ecology,Geography, Planning and Development,Food Science,Global and Planetary Change
Reference73 articles.
1. Global Assessment Report on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES, 2019); https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.3831673
2. Horton, R. & Lo, S. Planetary health: a new science for exceptional action. Lancet 386, 1921–1922 (2015).
3. Díaz, S. et al. Assessing nature’s contributions to people. Science 359, 270–272 (2018).
4. Lovell, R., Depledge, M. & Maxwell, S. Health and the Natural Environment: A Review of Evidence, Policy, Practice and Opportunities for the Future 1–161 (Defra, 2018); http://randd.defra.gov.uk/
5. Urban Green Spaces and Health: A Review of Evidence (World Health Organization, 2016); https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/345751
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献