Abstract
AbstractThe role of environmental selection in generating novel morphology is often taken for granted, and morphology is generally assumed to be adaptive. Bovids (antelopes and relatives) are widely differentiated in their dietary and climatic preferences, and presumably their cranial morphologies are the result of adaptation to different environmental pressures. In order to test these ideas, we performed 3D geometric morphometric analyses on 141 crania representing 96 bovid species in order to assess the influence of both extrinsic (e.g. diet, habitat) and intrinsic (size, modularity) factors on cranial shape. Surprisingly, we find that bovid crania are highly clumped in morphospace, with a large number of ecologically disparate species occupying a very similar range of morphology clustered around the mean shape. Differences in shape among dietary, habitat, and net primary productivity categories are largely non-significant, but we found a strong interaction between size and diet in explaining shape. We furthermore found no evidence for modularity having played a role in the generation of cranial differences across the bovid tree. Rather, the distribution of bovid cranial morphospace appears to be mainly the result of constraints imposed by a deeply conserved size-shape allometry, and dietary diversification the result of adaptation of existing allometric pathways.
Funder
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
General Agricultural and Biological Sciences,General Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology,Medicine (miscellaneous)
Reference66 articles.
1. Gould, S. J. Wonderful Life: The Burgess Shale and the Nature of History. (WW Norton & Company, 1989).
2. Mitteroecker, P. & Gunz, P. Advances in geometric morphometrics. Evol. Biol. 36, 235–247 (2009).
3. Polly, P. D. & Motz, G. J. Patterns and processes in morphospace: geometric morphometrics of three-dimensional objects. Paleontol. Soc. Pap. 22, 71–99 (2016).
4. IUCN. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. 2020–2. https://www.iucnredlist.org (2020).
5. Vrba, E. S. The significance of bovid remains as indicators of environment and predation patterns. In Fossils in the Making: Vertebrate Taphonomy and Paleoecology (eds Behrensmeyer, A. K. & Hill, A.) 247–271 (Univ. of Chicago Press, 1980).
Cited by
8 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Karyotype Symmetry/Asymmetry Index (S/AI) in Bovidae Taxa;Karamanoğlu Mehmetbey Üniversitesi Mühendislik ve Doğa Bilimleri Dergisi;2024-06-15
2. Functionally mediated cranial allometry evidenced in a genus of rock-wallabies;Biology Letters;2024-03
3. Facing the facts: adaptive trade‐offs along body size ranges determine mammalian craniofacial scaling;Biological Reviews;2023-11-29
4. Integrative taxonomy using historical specimens provides evidence for a single species of bushbuck, Tragelaphus scriptus (Mammalia: Bovidae);Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society;2023-09-25
5. Why the short face? The face lengths of sthenurine kangaroos scale with negative allometryCitation for this article: Richardson, W., Morales-García, N. M., Damuth, J., Singh, S., & Janis, C. M. (2024) Why the short face? The face lengths of sthenurine kangaroos scale with negative allometry.
Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology
. https://doi.org/10.1080/02724634.2024.2336145;Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology;2023-09-03