Abstract
AbstractHuman infants are born neurologically immature, potentially owing to conflicting selection pressures between bipedal locomotion and encephalization as suggested by the obstetrical dilemma hypothesis. Australopithecines are ideal for investigating this trade-off, having a bipedally adapted pelvis, yet relatively small brains. Our finite-element birth simulations indicate that rotational birth cannot be inferred from bony morphology alone. Based on a range of pelvic reconstructions and fetal head sizes, our simulations further imply that australopithecines, like humans, gave birth to immature, secondary altricial newborns with head sizes smaller than those predicted for non-human primates of the same body size especially when soft tissue thickness is adequately approximated. We conclude that australopithecines required cooperative breeding to care for their secondary altricial infants. These prerequisites for advanced cognitive development therefore seem to have been corollary to skeletal adaptations for bipedal locomotion that preceded the appearance of the genus Homo and the increase in encephalization.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
General Agricultural and Biological Sciences,General Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology,Medicine (miscellaneous)
Reference85 articles.
1. Dudenhausen, J. W., Obladen, M. & Pschyrembel, W. Practical Obstetrics. (De Gruyter, 2014).
2. Rosenberg, K. & Trevathan, W. Birth, obstetrics and human evolution. Br. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 109, 1199–1206 (2002).
3. Trevathan, W. Primate pelvic anatomy and implications for birth. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B 370, 20140065 (2015).
4. Martin, R. D. The evolution of human reproduction: a primatological perspective. Yrbk Phys. Anthropol. 50, 59–84 (2007).
5. Portmann, A. Die Tragzeiten der Primaten und die Dauer der Schwangerschaft beim Menschen: ein Problem der vergleichenden Biologie. Rev. Suisse Zool. 48, 511–518 (1941).
Cited by
10 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献