Abstract
AbstractCrimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever virus (CCHFV) can cause severe human disease and is considered a WHO priority pathogen due to the lack of efficacious vaccines and antivirals. A CCHF virus replicon particle (VRP) has previously shown protective efficacy in a lethal Ifnar-/- mouse model when administered as a single dose at least 3 days prior to challenge. Here, we determine that non-specific immune responses are not sufficient to confer short-term protection, since Lassa virus VRP vaccination 3 days prior to CCHFV challenge was not protective. We also investigate how CCHF VRP vaccination confers protective efficacy by examining viral kinetics, histopathology, clinical analytes and immunity early after challenge (3 and 6 days post infection) and compare to unvaccinated controls. We characterize how these effects differ based on vaccination period and correspond to previously reported CCHF VRP-mediated protection. Vaccinating Ifnar-/- mice with CCHF VRP 28, 14, 7, or 3 days prior to challenge, all known to confer complete protection, significantly reduced CCHFV viral load, mucosal shedding, and markers of clinical disease, with greater reductions associated with longer vaccination periods. Interestingly, there were no significant differences in innate immune responses, T cell activation, or antibody titers after challenge between groups of mice vaccinated a week or more before challenge, but higher anti-NP antibody avidity and effector function (ADCD) were positively associated with longer vaccination periods. These findings support the importance of antibody-mediated responses in VRP vaccine-mediated protection against CCHFV infection.
Funder
United States Department of Defense | Defense Threat Reduction Agency
U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases
Division of Intramural Research, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference73 articles.
1. Spengler, J. R., Bergeron, É. & Spiropoulou, C. F. Crimean-congo hemorrhagic fever and expansion from endemic regions. Curr. Opin. Virol. 34, 70–78 (2019).
2. WHO. Situation Report, Iraq: Week 31. https://iraq.un.org/sites/default/files/2022-08/WHO-Iraq-SitRep_Week-31.pdf (2022).
3. NETEC. Crimean-Congo Hemorrhagic Fever (CCHF) Situation Report: Cases Reported in Iraq, Georgia, and Spain. https://netec.org/2022/08/15/crimean-congo-hemorrhagic-fever-cchf-situation-report-cases-reported-in-iraq-georgia-and-spain/ (2022).
4. Sah, R. et al. Crimean-congo haemorrhagic fever (CCHF) outbreak in Iraq: currently emerging situation and mitigation strategies - correspondence. Int. J. Surg. 106, 106916 (2022).
5. Tasdelen Fisgin, N., Doganci, L., Tanyel, E. & Tulek, N. Initial high rate of misdiagnosis in crimean congo haemorrhagic fever patients in an endemic region of Turkey. Epidemiol. Infect 138, 139–144 (2010).