Estimating medical risk in human spaceflight

Author:

Antonsen Erik L.ORCID,Myers Jerry G.ORCID,Boley Lynn,Arellano John,Kerstman Eric,Kadwa Binaifer,Buckland Daniel M.ORCID,Van Baalen MaryORCID

Abstract

AbstractNASA and commercial spaceflight companies will soon be retuning humans to the Moon and then eventually sending them on to Mars. These distant planetary destinations will pose new risks—in particular for the health of the astronaut crews. The bulk of the evidence characterizing human health and performance in spaceflight has come from missions in Low Earth Orbit. As missions last longer and travel farther from Earth, medical risk is expected to contribute an increasing proportion of total mission risk. To date, there have been no reliable estimates of how much. The Integrated Medical Model (IMM) is a Probabilistic Risk Assessment (PRA) Monte-Carlo simulation tool developed by NASA for medical risk assessment. This paper uses the IMM to provide an evidence-based, quantified medical risk estimate comparison across different spaceflight mission durations. We discuss model limitations and unimplemented capabilities providing insight into the complexity of medical risk estimation for human spaceflight. The results enable prioritization of medical needs in the context of other mission risks. These findings provide a reasonable bounding estimate for medical risk in missions to the Moon and Mars and hold value for risk managers and mission planners in performing cost-benefit trades for mission capability and research investments.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Space and Planetary Science,Physics and Astronomy (miscellaneous),Agricultural and Biological Sciences (miscellaneous),Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology (miscellaneous),Materials Science (miscellaneous),Medicine (miscellaneous)

Reference32 articles.

1. Apollo 17 Timeline. https://history.nasa.gov/SP-4029/Apollo_17i_Timeline.htm. (Accessed 18 Feb 2021).

2. Safe Passage: Astronaut Care for Exploration Missions (National Academies Press, 2001).

3. Antonsen, E., Hansen, A., Shah, R., Reed, R. & Canga, M. Conceptual Drivers for an Exploration Medical System. In 67th International Astronautical Congress vol. IAC-16,A1,3,9,x35689 10 (International Astronautical Federation, 2016).

4. Krihak, M., Middour, C., Reyes, D., Nusbaum, D. & Antonsen, E. Communication Bandwidth Considerations for Exploration Medical Care during Space Missions NASA/TM-2019-220335 (2019).

5. Seibert, M. A., Lim, D. S. S., Miller, M. J., Santiago-Materese, D. & Downs, M. T. Developing future deep-space telecommunication architectures: a historical look at the benefits of analog research on the development of solar system internetworking for future human spaceflight. Astrobiology 19, 462–477 (2019).

Cited by 31 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3