Abstract
AbstractWhen participants are asked to flip an omnidirectional switch “down”, the direction of their responses depends mainly on gravicentric, less so on egocentric and least on visual cues about the vertical (Lackner and DiZio, Exp. Brain Res. 130:2−26, 2000). Here we evaluate response direction when gravicentric cues are not available. Participants flipped an omnidirectional switch “down” when gravito-inertial force acted orthogonally to the response plane on earth (session E), and when it was near zero during parabolic flights (session P). We found that the relative weight of visual cues was similar in both sessions, and it was similar to that in an earlier study where participants stood upright. Across all three data sets, the weight of visual cues averaged 0.09. The relative weight of egocentric cues was also similar in both sessions, averaging 0.87; however, it was significantly lower in the earlier study with upright participants, where it averaged 0.43. We further found that informative and noninformative tactile stimulation had no substantial effects on response direction, which suggests that the earlier reported anchoring effect of tactile signals for the perceived vertical may not extend to the motor vertical. We conclude that the absence of gravicentric cues is compensated by a higher weight of egocentric cues, but not by a higher weight of visual cues. As a consequence, astronauts, divers and persons who work on ground in a horizontal body posture may mishandle equipment because of their strong reliance on egocentric cues.
Funder
Bundesministerium für Wirtschaft und Energie
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Space and Planetary Science,Physics and Astronomy (miscellaneous),Agricultural and Biological Sciences (miscellaneous),Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology (miscellaneous),Materials Science (miscellaneous),Medicine (miscellaneous)
Reference43 articles.
1. Lackner, J. R. & DiZio, P. Human orientation and movement control in weightless and artificial gravity enviroments. Exp. Brain Res. 130, 2–26 (2000).
2. Rock, I. The perception of the egocentric orientation of a line. J. Exp. Psychol. 48, 367–374 (1954).
3. Paillard, J. (ed.) Motor and representational framing of space. In Brain and Space 163–182 (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1991).
4. Glasauer, S. & Mittelstaedt, H. Perception of spatial orientation in microgravity. Brain Res. Rev. 28, 185–193 (1998).
5. Witkin, H. A. & Asch, S. E. Studies in space orientation. IV. Further experiments on perception of the upright with displaced visual field. J. Exp. Psychol. 38, 762–782 (1948).
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献