Abstract
AbstractPrimary Care Providers (PCPs) often deal with patients on daily clinical practice without knowing anything about their smoking status and willingness to quit. The aim of this metasynthesis is to explore the PCPs and patients who are smokers perspectives regarding the issue of smoking cessation within primary care settings. It relies on the model of meta-ethnography and follows thematic synthesis procedures. Twenty-two studies are included, reporting on the view of 580 participants. Three main themes emerge: (i) What lacks, (ii) Some expectations but no request, and (iii) How to address the issue and induce patients’ motivation. Our results reveal a global feeling of a lack of legitimacy among PCPs when it comes to addressing the issue of tobacco and smoking cessation with their patients, even though they have developed creative strategies based on what is at the core of their practice, that is proximity, continuity, long-term and trustworthy relationship.
Funder
IReSP Institut de recherche en santé publique grant reference number:APA19002HSA
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
Reference88 articles.
1. WHO. World Health Organization. https://www.who.int/news-room/detail/19-12-2019-who-launches-new-report-on-global-tobacco-use-trends. Accessed 1 Jan 2020. (2019).
2. Lawson, P. J. & Flocke, A. S. Teachable moments for health behavior change: a concept analysis. Patient Educ. Couns. 76, 25–30 (2009).
3. Satterfield, J. M. et al. Computer-facilitated 5A’s for smoking cessation: a randomized trial of technology to promote provider adherence. Am. J. Prev. Med. 55, 35–43 (2018).
4. Heckman, C. J., Egleston, B. L. & Hofmann, M. T. Efficacy of motivational interviewing for smoking cessation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Tob. Control 19, 410–416 (2010).
5. Frost, H. et al. Effectiveness of Motivational Interviewing on adult behaviour change in health and social care settings: a systematic review of reviews. PLoS ONE 13, e0204890 (2018).
Cited by
15 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献