Abstract
AbstractDozens of frameworks have been proposed to assess evidence for digital health interventions (DHIs), but existing frameworks may not facilitate DHI evidence reviews that meet the needs of stakeholder organizations including payers, health systems, trade organizations, and others. These organizations may benefit from a DHI assessment framework that is both rigorous and rapid. Here we propose a framework to assess Evidence in Digital health for EFfectiveness of INterventions with Evaluative Depth (Evidence DEFINED). Designed for real-world use, the Evidence DEFINED Quick Start Guide may help streamline DHI assessment. A checklist is provided summarizing high-priority evidence considerations in digital health. Evidence-to-recommendation guidelines are proposed, specifying degrees of adoption that may be appropriate for a range of evidence quality levels. Evidence DEFINED differs from prior frameworks in its inclusion of unique elements designed for rigor and speed. Rigor is increased by addressing three gaps in prior frameworks. First, prior frameworks are not adapted adequately to address evidence considerations that are unique to digital health. Second, prior frameworks do not specify evidence quality criteria requiring increased vigilance for DHIs in the current regulatory context. Third, extant frameworks rarely leverage established, robust methodologies that were developed for non-digital interventions. Speed is achieved in the Evidence DEFINED Framework through screening optimization and deprioritization of steps that may have limited value. The primary goals of Evidence DEFINED are to a) facilitate standardized, rapid, rigorous DHI evidence assessment in organizations and b) guide digital health solutions providers who wish to generate evidence that drives DHI adoption.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Health Information Management,Health Informatics,Computer Science Applications,Medicine (miscellaneous)
Reference50 articles.
1. IQVIA. Digital health trends 2021: innovation, evidence, regulation, and adoption. https://www.iqvia.com/insights/the-iqvia-institute/reports/digital-health-trends-2021 (2021).
2. Guo, C. et al. Challenges for the evaluation of digital health solutions—a call for innovative evidence generation approaches. NPJ Digital Med. 3, 1–14 (2020).
3. American Medical Association. AMA unveils playbook to speed digital health adoption. https://www.ama-assn.org/practice-management/digital/ama-unveils-playbook-speed-digital-health-adoption (2018).
4. American Psychiatric Association. The App Evaluation Model. https://www.psychiatry.org/psychiatrists/practice/mental-health-apps/the-app-evaluation-model (2021).
5. Stanford University Center for Digital Health & Rock Health. Digital Health Consumer Adoption Report 2020. https://rockhealth.com/reports/digital-health-consumer-adoption-report-2020/ (2020).