The IMPACT framework and implementation for accessible in silico clinical phenotyping in the digital era
-
Published:2023-07-21
Issue:1
Volume:6
Page:
-
ISSN:2398-6352
-
Container-title:npj Digital Medicine
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:npj Digit. Med.
Author:
Wen AndrewORCID, He HuanORCID, Fu Sunyang, Liu Sijia, Miller Kurt, Wang Liwei, Roberts Kirk E.ORCID, Bedrick Steven D.ORCID, Hersh William R., Liu Hongfang
Abstract
AbstractClinical phenotyping is often a foundational requirement for obtaining datasets necessary for the development of digital health applications. Traditionally done via manual abstraction, this task is often a bottleneck in development due to time and cost requirements, therefore raising significant interest in accomplishing this task via in-silico means. Nevertheless, current in-silico phenotyping development tends to be focused on a single phenotyping task resulting in a dearth of reusable tools supporting cross-task generalizable in-silico phenotyping. In addition, in-silico phenotyping remains largely inaccessible for a substantial portion of potentially interested users. Here, we highlight the barriers to the usage of in-silico phenotyping and potential solutions in the form of a framework of several desiderata as observed during our implementation of such tasks. In addition, we introduce an example implementation of said framework as a software application, with a focus on ease of adoption, cross-task reusability, and facilitating the clinical phenotyping algorithm development process.
Funder
U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | U.S. National Library of Medicine
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Health Information Management,Health Informatics,Computer Science Applications,Medicine (miscellaneous)
Reference61 articles.
1. Weng, C., Tu, S. W., Sim, I. & Richesson, R. Formal representation of eligibility criteria: a literature review. J. Biomed. Inf. 43, 451–467 (2010). 2. Richesson, R. L., Horvath, M. M. & Rusincovitch, S. A. Clinical research informatics and electronic health record data. Yearb. Med. Inf. 9, 215–223 (2014). 3. Thadani, S. R., Weng, C., Bigger, J. T., Ennever, J. F. & Wajngurt, D. Electronic screening improves efficiency in clinical trial recruitment. J. Am. Med. Inf. Assoc. 16, 869–873 (2009). 4. Pathak, J., Kho, A. N. & Denny, J. C. Electronic health records-driven phenotyping: challenges, recent advances, and perspectives. J. Am. Med. Inf. Assoc. 20, e206–e211 (2013). 5. Campion, T. R., Craven, C. K., Dorr, D. A. & Knosp, B. M. Understanding enterprise data warehouses to support clinical and translational research. J. Am. Med. Inf. Assoc. 27, 1352–1358 (2020).
|
|