Abstract
AbstractThe current prostate cancer (PCa) screen test, prostate-specific antigen (PSA), has a high sensitivity for PCa but low specificity for high-risk, clinically significant PCa (csPCa), resulting in overdiagnosis and overtreatment of non-csPCa. Early identification of csPCa while avoiding unnecessary biopsies in men with non-csPCa is challenging. We built an optimized machine learning platform (ClarityDX) and showed its utility in generating models predicting csPCa. Integrating the ClarityDX platform with blood-based biomarkers for clinically significant PCa and clinical biomarker data from a 3448-patient cohort, we developed a test to stratify patients’ risk of csPCa; called ClarityDX Prostate. When predicting high risk cancer in the validation cohort, ClarityDX Prostate showed 95% sensitivity, 35% specificity, 54% positive predictive value, and 91% negative predictive value, at a ≥ 25% threshold. Using ClarityDX Prostate at this threshold could avoid up to 35% of unnecessary prostate biopsies. ClarityDX Prostate showed higher accuracy for predicting the risk of csPCa than PSA alone and the tested model-based risk calculators. Using this test as a reflex test in men with elevated PSA levels may help patients and their healthcare providers decide if a prostate biopsy is necessary.
Funder
Alberta Innovates
Alberta Cancer Foundation
Prostate Cancer Canada
Prostate Cancer Fight Foundation and the Ride for Dad.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference53 articles.
1. Sung, H. et al. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA: A Cancer J. Clin. 71, 209–249 (2021).
2. Desai, C., Ehsanullah, S. A., Bhojwani, A. & Dhanasekaran, A. 648 External Validation of The European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer Risk Calculator 3 (ERSPC-RC3) In the Detection of Prostate Cancer and Avoiding Unnecessary Prostate Biopsies. British J. Surg. 108 https://doi.org/10.1093/bjs/znab134.566 (2021).
3. Verbeek, J. F. M. & Roobol, M. J. What is an acceptable false negative rate in the detection of prostate cancer? Transl. Androl. Urol. 7, 54–60 (2018).
4. Alford, A. V. et al. The use of biomarkers in prostate cancer screening and treatment. Rev. Urol. 19, 221–234 (2017).
5. Chang, E. K., Gadzinski, A. J. & Nyame, Y. A. Blood and urine biomarkers in prostate cancer: Are we ready for reflex testing in men with an elevated prostate-specific antigen? Asian J. Urol. 8, 343–353 (2021).