Secondary care provider attitudes towards patient generated health data from smartwatches

Author:

Alpert Jordan M.ORCID,Manini Todd,Roberts Megan,Kota Naga S. Prabhakar,Mendoza Tonatiuh V.,Solberg Laurence M.,Rashidi Parisa

Abstract

AbstractWearable devices, like smartwatches, are increasingly used for tracking physical activity, community mobility, and monitoring symptoms. Data generated from smartwatches (PGHD_SW) is a form of patient-generated health data, which can benefit providers by supplying frequent temporal information about patients. The goal of this study was to understand providers’ perceptions towards PGHD_SW adoption and its integration with electronic medical records. In-depth, semi-structured qualitative interviews were conducted with 12 providers from internal medicine, family medicine, geriatric medicine, nursing, surgery, rehabilitation, and anesthesiology. Diffusion of Innovations was used as a framework to develop questions and guide data analysis. The constant comparative method was utilized to formulate salient themes from the interviews. Four main themes emerged: (1) PGHD_SW is perceived as a relative advantage; (2) data are viewed as compatible with current practices; (3) barriers to overcome to effectively use PGHD_SW; (4) assessments from viewing sample data. Overall, PGHD_SW was valued because it enabled access to information about patients that were traditionally unattainable. It also can initiate discussions between patients and providers. Providers consider PGHD_SW important, but data preferences varied by specialty. The successful adoption of PGHD_SW will depend on tailoring data, frequencies of reports, and visualization preferences to correspond with the demands of providers.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Health Information Management,Health Informatics,Computer Science Applications,Medicine (miscellaneous)

Reference57 articles.

1. Street, R. L. Analyzing communication in medical consultations: do behavioral measures correspond to patients’ perceptions? Med. Care 30, 976–988 (1992).

2. Martin, C. M., Banwell, C. L., Broom, D. H. & Nisa, M. Consultation length and chronic illness care in general practice: a qualitative study. Med. J. Aust. 171, 77–81 (1999).

3. Nelson, E. et al. Functional health status levels of primary care patients. Jama 249, 3331–3338 (1983).

4. Marrero, D. G. et al. Twenty-first century behavioral medicine: a context for empowering clinicians and patients with diabetes. A Consens. Rep. 36, 463–470 (2013).

5. Institute of Medicine Committee on Quality of Health Care in America. Crossing the quality chasm: A new health system for the 21st century. (National Academy Press, 2001).

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3