Variability in historical emissions trends suggests a need for a wide range of global scenarios and regional analyses

Author:

Pedersen Jiesper Strandsbjerg TristanORCID,van Vuuren Detlef P.ORCID,Aparício Bruno A.ORCID,Swart Rob,Gupta Joyeeta,Santos Filipe Duarte

Abstract

AbstractLong-term developments in carbon dioxide emissions have tracked the middle of projected emission scenario ranges over the past three decades. If this tendency continues, it seems increasingly less likely that future emissions will follow current high-emission scenarios. However, in the past, periods of slow and fast global emissions growth was observed, which have led to previous critiques of scenarios being too low or too high. In the light of such unpredictability and since scenarios are meant to explore plausible futures, we here argue that a broad range of emission scenarios continue to be considered input in scenario-based analyses of future climate change. Furthermore, we find substantial regional differences in emissions trends. Territorial emissions in OECD countries fall on the low side of emission scenario ranges, whereas non-OECD territorial emissions fell closer to the medium or high-end. Since non-OECD emissions will become increasingly important, we recommend further exploring the relationships between regional and global emissions to support scenario assumptions and climate policymaking.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

General Earth and Planetary Sciences,General Environmental Science

Reference56 articles.

1. Raskin, P., Monks, F., Ribeiro, T., van Vuuren, D. & Zurek, M. Global Scenarios in Historical Perspective. Ecosystems and Human Well-Being: Scenarios: Findings of the Scenarios Working Group 35–44. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/780d/43ae4d93304b3d4d31f229656fd1d2aa02d5.pdf (2005).

2. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Climate Change 2014 Synthesis Report (2014).

3. Moss, R. H. et al. The next generation of scenarios for climate change research and assessment. Nature 463, 747–756 (2010).

4. van Vuuren, D. P. et al. What do near-term observations tell us about long-term developments in greenhouse gas emissions? Clim. Change 103, 635–642 (2010).

5. Pielke, R. & Ritchie, J. Systemic misuse of scenarios in climate research and assessment. SSRN Electr. J. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3581777 (2020).

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3