Abstract
AbstractThe two vast Patagonian icefields are a global hotspot for ice-loss. However, not much is known about the total ice volume they store - let alone its spatial distribution. One reason is that the abundant record of direct thickness measurements has never been systematically exploited. Here, this record is combined with remotely-sensed information on past ice thickness mapped from glacier retreat. Both datasets are incorporated in a state-of-the-art, mass-conservation approach to produce a well-informed map of the basal topography beneath the icefields. Its major asset is the reliability increase of thicknesses values along the many marine- and lake-terminating glaciers. For these, frontal ice-discharge is notably lower than previously reported. This finding implies that direct climatic control was more influential for past ice loss. We redact a total volume for both icefields in 2000 of 5351 km3. Despite the wealth of observations used in this assessment, relative volume uncertainties remain elevated.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference75 articles.
1. Farinotti, D. et al. A consensus estimate for the ice thickness distribution of all glaciers on Earth. Nat. Geosci. 12, 22–28 (2019).
2. Millan, R., Mouginot, J., Rabatel, A. & Morlighem, M. Ice velocity and thickness of the world’s glaciers. Nat. Geosci. 15, 124–129 (2022).
3. RGI Consortium (ed.) Randolph Glacier Inventory ? A Dataset of Global Glacier Outlines: Version 6.0: Technical Report (Global Land Ice Measurements from Space, Colorado, USA. Digital Media, 2017).
4. Randolph Glacier Inventory - A Dataset of Global Glacier Outlines, Version 6 https://doi.org/10.7265/4m1f-gd79 (2017).
5. Garreaud, R. D. The Andes climate and weather. Adv. Geosci. 22, 3–11 (2009).
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献