Phase II trial of pembrolizumab, ipilimumab, and aspirin in melanoma: clinical outcomes and translational predictors of response
-
Published:2024-06-24
Issue:1
Volume:2
Page:
-
ISSN:2731-9377
-
Container-title:BJC Reports
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:BJC Rep
Author:
Quandt Zoe, Jacob Saya, Fadlullah Muhammad Zaki Hidayatullah, Wu Chaorong, Wu Clinton, Huppert Laura, Levine Lauren S., Sison Paula, Tsai Katy K., Chow Melissa, Kang Jee Hye, Hwang Jimmy, Lee James C., Oglesby Ariel, Venegas Jessica, Brintz Ben J., Tan Aik Choon, Anderson Mark S., Rosenblum Michael D., Young ArabellaORCID, Daud Adil I.ORCID
Abstract
Abstract
Objective
Many patients with melanoma treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) do not derive response. Preclinical and retrospective studies identified that inhibition of the cyclooxygenase (COX) pathway may improve response to ICI treatment.
Methods
This prospective single site phase II trial accrued patients with advanced/metastatic melanoma. Participants underwent high-dose aspirin daily combined with pembrolizumab and ipilimumab every 3 weeks for 4 cycles followed by high-dose aspirin and pembrolizumab monotherapy. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR). Longitudinal sampling of blood was performed to assess peripheral immune correlates.
Results
Twenty-seven subjects were enrolled with median follow-up of 32 months. An ORR of 62.9% was reached prior to discontinuation due to low likelihood of achieving the pre-specified ORR of 80%. 17 patients (63%) experienced a treatment-related adverse event (TRAEs) grade 3 or higher. A per-protocol analysis showed that patients able to continue aspirin alongside ICI through the induction period experienced significant survival benefit. Ten cytokines and increased regulatory T cells in the periphery correlated with beneficial response.
Conclusions
The addition of high-dose aspirin to combination ICI within this study results in response comparable to ICI alone. Future clinical studies of COX inhibition will need to focus on mitigation of AEs to establish the clinical utility of this combination.
Funder
Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference46 articles.
1. Ribas A, Wolchok JD. Cancer immunotherapy using checkpoint blockade. Science. 2018;359:1350–5. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aar4060. 2. Hamid O, Robert C, Daud A, Hodi FS, Hwu WJ, Kefford R, et al. Safety and tumor responses with lambrolizumab (Anti-PD-1) in Melanoma. N Engl J Med. Published online June 2, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1305133. 3. Topalian SL, Hodi FS, Brahmer JR, Gettinger SN, Smith DC, McDermott DF, et al. Safety, activity, and immune correlates of anti-PD-1 antibody in cancer. N Engl J Med. 2012;366:2443–54. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1200690. 4. Robert C, Ribas A, Wolchok JD, Hodi FS, Hamid O, Kefford R et al. Anti-programmed-death-receptor-1 treatment with pembrolizumab in ipilimumab-refractory advanced melanoma: a randomised dose-comparison cohort of a phase 1 trial. Lancet. Published online July 14, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60958-2. 5. Tawbi HA, Schadendorf D, Lipson EJ, Ascierto PA, Matamala L, Castillo Gutiérrez E, et al. Relatlimab and Nivolumab versus Nivolumab in Untreated Advanced Melanoma. N Engl J Med. 2022;386:24–34. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2109970.
|
|