Author:
Kumar Amit,Kapoor Akhil,Noronha Vanita,Patil Vijay,Menon Nandini,Singh Ajay Kumar,Joshi Amit,Janu Amit,Kaushal Rajiv Kumar,Pai Trupti,Chougule Anuradha,Shetty Omshree,Prabhash Kumar
Abstract
Abstract
Background
ALK-positive lung cancers are known to have favorable responses with oral tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Lorlatinib is an approved treatment option post first and second-line ALK inhibitors and is now also in first line. We present a retrospective observational study of the safety and efficacy of patients receiving Lorlatinib in second-line and beyond.
Methods
We conducted a retrospective observational study of ALK-positive patients who received Lorlatinib post-progression or intolerance to initial therapy at the Medical Oncology department. The patients who were started on Lorlatinib between January 2018 to December 2019 were included. The patients underwent routine blood and radiological evaluation every two to three months.
Results
A total of 38 patients received Lorlatinib in the specified period. The median age was 48 years (range 23–68), with 53% of patients being male, 37% having comorbidities; the most common being hypertension and diabetes and 79% of patients were of ECOG-PS1. Twenty-two patients (58%) had received two prior TKIs. The most common sites of metastasis before starting Lorlatinib were brain (55%) and bone (53%). All patients except one received prior whole-brain radiotherapy with 4 receiving radiation twice. The median follow-up period was 49 months (95% CI: 46.4–51.6). Eighty-four percent showed disease control with median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of 16 months (95% CI 5.4–26.6) and 22 months (95% CI 9.9–34.1) respectively. Twelve patients died without documented progression. Five out of twelve with documented progression had brain involvement while six had lung involvement. Twelve out of twenty-four patients who progressed received subsequent chemotherapy. The most common grade 3 and above toxicities were hypercholesterolemia and hypertriglyceridemia. Three (7.8%) patients required dose reduction.
Conclusion
This real-world data confirms the efficacy of Lorlatinib in the second line and beyond with adverse effects matching that of registration studies.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference26 articles.
1. Noronha V, Pinninti R, Patil VM, Joshi A, Prabhash K. Lung cancer in the Indian subcontinent. South Asian J Cancer. 2016;5:95–103.
2. Kapoor A, Noronha V, Patil V, Menon N, Joshi A, Kumar A, et al. Clinical profile, practice pattern, and outcomes with first-line therapy in ALK-positive lung cancer: real-world data from resource-constrained settings. JTO Clin Res Rep. 2022;4:100443.
3. Solomon BJ, Mok T, Kim DW, Wu YL, Nakagawa K, Mekhail T, et al. First-line crizotinib versus chemotherapy in ALK-positive lung cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 2014;371:2167–77.
4. Peters S, Camidge DR, Shaw AT, Gadgeel S, Ahn JS, Kim DW, et al. Alectinib versus crizotinib in untreated ALK-positive non- small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med. 2017;377:829–38.
5. Mok T, Camidge DR, Gadgeel SM, Rosell R, Dziadziusko R, Kim D-W, et al. Updated overall survival and final progression-free survival data for patients with treatment-naive advanced ALK-positive non-small-cell lung cancer in the ALEX study. Ann Oncol. 2020;31:1056–64.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献