Abstract
AbstractDefining and measuring progress in adaptation are important questions for climate adaptation science, policy, and practice. Here, we assess the progress of urban adaptation planning in 327 European cities between 2005 and 2020 using three ‘ADAptation plan Quality Assessment’ indices, called ADAQA-1/ 2/ 3, that combine six plan quality principles. Half of the cities have an adaptation plan and its quality significantly increased over time. However, generally, plan quality is still low in many cities. Participation and monitoring and evaluation are particularly weak aspects in urban adaptation policy, together with plan ‘consistency’. Consistency connects impacts and vulnerabilities with adaptation goals, planned measures, actions, monitoring and evaluation, and participation processes. Consistency is a key factor in the overall quality of plans. To help evaluate the quality of plans and policies and promote learning, we suggest incorporating our ADAptation plan Quality Assessment indices into the portfolio of adaptation progress assessments and tracking methodologies.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference64 articles.
1. UNFCC-United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. Paris Agreement. https://unfccc.int/sites/default/files/resource/parisagreement_publication.pdf. (2015).
2. Lesnikowski, A. et al. What does the Paris Agreement mean for adaptation? Clim. Policy 17, 825–831 (2017).
3. Tompkins, E. L., Vincent, K., Nicholls, R. J. & Suckall, N. Documenting the state of adaptation for the global stocktake of the Paris Agreement. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Clim. Chang. 9, e545 (2018).
4. Berrang-Ford, L. et al. Tracking global climate change adaptation among governments. Nat. Clim. Change. 9, 440–449 (2019).
5. Araos, M. et al. Climate change adaptation planning in large cities: a systematic global assessment. Environ. Sci. Policy 66, 375–382 (2016).
Cited by
30 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献