Abstract
AbstractCities have emerged as policy actors of global relevance in sustainable development, and their strengthened position challenges the primacy of national states in this area. To account for this shift and for potential emerging contestations between cities and national states, we propose a framework to understand national–urban relations in sustainable development policy-making. Based on a selection of twelve case study vignettes from European cities, we identify and discuss four ideal types of urban sustainable development policy, which are classified depending on their congruence with the national policy agenda and the scale of the issue at hand. Building on this typology, we reflect on positioning strategies that cities can develop to support, promote or defend these policies. We argue that accounting for these different positioning strategies is important for understanding how cities seek to put specifically urban takes of sustainable development on global agendas.
Funder
The initial data for this article was gathered as part of a study commissioned by the City of Zurich in 2020.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference41 articles.
1. Parnell, S. Defining a Global Urban Development Agenda. World Dev. 78, 529–540 (2016).
2. Rosenzweig, C. Climate change and cities: first assessment report of the Urban Climate Change Research Network. (Cambridge University Press, 2011).
3. Campbell, S. Green Cities, Growing Cities, Just Cities?: Urban Planning and the Contradictions of Sustainable Development. J. Am. Plann. Assoc. 62, 296–312 (1996).
4. Joy, M. & Vogel, R. K. Beyond Neoliberalism: A Policy Agenda for a Progressive City. Urban Aff. Rev. 57, 1372–1409 (2021).
5. Keil, R. & Whitehead, M. Cities and the politics of sustainability. in The Oxford Handbook of Urban Politics (eds. Mossberger, K., Clarke, S. E. & John, P.) (Oxford University Press, 2012).
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献