Real-world experience of patients with multiple myeloma receiving ide-cel after a prior BCMA-targeted therapy
-
Published:2023-08-09
Issue:1
Volume:13
Page:
-
ISSN:2044-5385
-
Container-title:Blood Cancer Journal
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Blood Cancer J.
Author:
Ferreri Christopher J.ORCID, Hildebrandt Michelle A. T., Hashmi Hamza, Shune Leyla O., McGuirk Joseph P.ORCID, Sborov Douglas W., Wagner Charlotte B.ORCID, Kocoglu M. Hakan, Rapoport Aaron, Atrash Shebli, Voorhees Peter M., Khouri Jack, Dima Danai, Afrough Aimaz, Kaur Gurbakhash, Anderson Larry D.ORCID, Simmons Gary, Davis James A.ORCID, Kalariya Nilesh, Peres Lauren C.ORCID, Lin YiORCID, Janakiram Murali, Nadeem Omar, Alsina Melissa, Locke Frederick L., Sidana SurbhiORCID, Hansen Doris K., Patel Krina K.ORCID, Castaneda Puglianini Omar AlexisORCID
Abstract
AbstractMost patients with multiple myeloma experience disease relapse after treatment with a B-cell maturation antigen-targeted therapy (BCMA-TT), and data describing outcomes for patients treated with sequential BCMA-TT are limited. We analyzed clinical outcomes for patients infused with standard-of-care idecabtagene vicleucel, an anti-BCMA chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy, at 11 US medical centers. A total of 50 patients with prior BCMA-TT exposure (38 antibody-drug conjugate, 7 bispecific, 5 CAR T) and 153 patients with no prior BCMA-TT were infused with ide-cel, with a median follow-up duration of 4.5 and 6.0 months, respectively. Safety outcomes between cohorts were comparable. The prior BCMA-TT cohort had a lower overall response rate (74% versus 88%; p = 0.021), median duration of response (7.4 versus 9.6 months; p = 0.03), and median progression-free survival (3.2 months versus 9.0 months; p = 0.0002) compared to the cohort without prior BCMA-TT. All five patients who received a prior anti-BCMA CAR T responded to ide-cel, and survival outcomes were best for this subgroup. In conclusion, treatment with ide-cel yielded meaningful clinical responses in real-world patients exposed to a prior BCMA-TT, though response rates and durability were suboptimal compared to those not treated with a prior BCMA-TT.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Oncology,Hematology
Reference28 articles.
1. Mikhael J. Treatment options for triple-class refractory multiple myeloma. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2020;20:1–7. 2. Chari A, Vogl DT, Gavriatopoulou M, Nooka AK, Yee AJ, Huff CA, et al. Oral selinexor–dexamethasone for triple-class refractory multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med. 2019;381:727–38. 3. Lonial S, Lee HC, Badros A, Trudel S, Nooka AK, Chari A, et al. Belantamab mafodotin for relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (DREAMM-2): a two-arm, randomised, open-label, phase 2 study. Lancet Oncol. 2020;21:207–21. 4. GSK provides update on DREAMM-3 phase III trial for Blenrep in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. 2022. https://www.gsk.com/en-gb/media/press-releases/gsk-provides-update-on-dreamm-3-phase-iii-trial-for-blenrep/. 5. Munshi NC, Anderson LD, Shah N, Madduri D, Berdeja J, Lonial S, et al. Idecabtagene vicleucel in relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med. 2021;384:705–16.
Cited by
41 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|