Cryo-EM model validation recommendations based on outcomes of the 2019 EMDataResource challenge
-
Published:2021-02
Issue:2
Volume:18
Page:156-164
-
ISSN:1548-7091
-
Container-title:Nature Methods
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Nat Methods
Author:
Lawson Catherine L.ORCID, Kryshtafovych AndriyORCID, Adams Paul D.ORCID, Afonine Pavel V., Baker Matthew L.ORCID, Barad Benjamin A.ORCID, Bond PaulORCID, Burnley TomORCID, Cao RenzhiORCID, Cheng Jianlin, Chojnowski GrzegorzORCID, Cowtan KevinORCID, Dill Ken A.ORCID, DiMaio Frank, Farrell Daniel P.ORCID, Fraser James S.ORCID, Herzik Mark A.ORCID, Hoh Soon WenORCID, Hou JieORCID, Hung Li-Wei, Igaev MaximORCID, Joseph Agnel P.ORCID, Kihara DaisukeORCID, Kumar DilipORCID, Mittal SumitORCID, Monastyrskyy BohdanORCID, Olek MateuszORCID, Palmer Colin M.ORCID, Patwardhan ArdanORCID, Perez AlbertoORCID, Pfab JonasORCID, Pintilie Grigore D.ORCID, Richardson Jane S.ORCID, Rosenthal Peter B.ORCID, Sarkar DaipayanORCID, Schäfer Luisa U.ORCID, Schmid Michael F.ORCID, Schröder Gunnar F.ORCID, Shekhar Mrinal, Si DongORCID, Singharoy AbishekORCID, Terashi GenkiORCID, Terwilliger Thomas C.ORCID, Vaiana AndreaORCID, Wang Liguo, Wang ZheORCID, Wankowicz Stephanie A., Williams Christopher J., Winn MartynORCID, Wu Tianqi, Yu XiaodiORCID, Zhang KaimingORCID, Berman Helen M.ORCID, Chiu WahORCID
Abstract
AbstractThis paper describes outcomes of the 2019 Cryo-EM Model Challenge. The goals were to (1) assess the quality of models that can be produced from cryogenic electron microscopy (cryo-EM) maps using current modeling software, (2) evaluate reproducibility of modeling results from different software developers and users and (3) compare performance of current metrics used for model evaluation, particularly Fit-to-Map metrics, with focus on near-atomic resolution. Our findings demonstrate the relatively high accuracy and reproducibility of cryo-EM models derived by 13 participating teams from four benchmark maps, including three forming a resolution series (1.8 to 3.1 Å). The results permit specific recommendations to be made about validating near-atomic cryo-EM structures both in the context of individual experiments and structure data archives such as the Protein Data Bank. We recommend the adoption of multiple scoring parameters to provide full and objective annotation and assessment of the model, reflective of the observed cryo-EM map density.
Funder
U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | Office of Extramural Research, National Institutes of Health RCUK | Medical Research Council RCUK | Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council Max-Planck-Gesellschaft Wellcome Trust National Science Foundation Purdue Institute of Drug Discovery Welch Foundation
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Cell Biology,Molecular Biology,Biochemistry,Biotechnology
Reference55 articles.
1. Mitra, A. K. Visualization of biological macromolecules at near-atomic resolution: cryo-electron microscopy comes of age. Acta Cryst. F 75, 3–11 (2019). 2. Lawson, C. L., Berman, H. M. & Chiu, W. Evolving data standards for cryo-EM structures. Struct. Dyn. 7, 014701 (2020). 3. Henderson, R. et al. Outcome of the first electron microscopy validation task force meeting. Structure 20, 205–214 (2012). 4. Read, R. J. et al. A new generation of crystallographic validation tools for the Protein Data Bank. Structure 19, 1395–1412 (2011). 5. Montelione, G. T. et al. Recommendations of the wwPDB NMR Validation Task Force. Structure 21, 1563–1570 (2013).
Cited by
88 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|