Prerequisites for the legal mechanisms development to combat disinformation in social media in the context of national security: problem statement

Author:

Marushchak A. I.ORCID

Abstract

The article deals with the preconditions for the legal mechanisms development to combat disinformation in social media in the context of national security. The conclusion is formulated on the necessity of the development of such mechanisms on the basis of constitutional freedom of speech principle, with legislative definition of the exclusive possible restriction list in social media for the sake of national security. It is noted that the difference between legal and corporate internal norms of regulation of social media companies directly affects the effectiveness of national interests’ protection both in the United States and Ukraine. Because the non-binding provisions of the First Amendment of the US Constitution for private entities determine the orientation of social media companies to make a profit, although the policy of Facebook and Google adheres to the principles of freedom of speech. In the context of capacity building of the Centre for Countering Disinformation, counteracting disinformation campaigns for national security reasons requires a combination of efforts of the Centre with the national cybersecurity system, and with regulatory bodies of the media, strategic communications units of Ukraine Government in close cooperation with the private sector, primarily social media companies, and civil society. It is concluded that compared to the US government, Ukrainian government has broader constitutional preconditions for the national security interests’ protection, particularly in connection with Russian Federation aggression. It is noted that regulations on combating disinformation in social networks should take into account international human rights requirements, national interests, as well as business processes of social media companies.

Publisher

Kharkiv National University of Internal Affairs

Subject

General Medicine,General Chemistry

Reference11 articles.

1. Preuss L., 1934. International Responsibility for Hostile Propaganda against Foreign States. American Journal of International Law, Vol. 28, No. 4, pp. 649-668.

2. Chander A., 2016. Internet Intermediaries as Platforms for Expression and Innovation. Global Commission on Internet Governance, [online] No. 42. Available at https://www.cigionline.org/static/documents/documents/GCIG%20no.42.pdf [Accessed 7 December 2021].

3. Marwick A. and Lewis R. Media Manipulation and Disinformation Online. [online] Data & Society. Available at https://datasociety.net/output/media-manipulation-and-disinfo-online/ [Accessed 7 December 2021].

4. Langvardt K., 2018. Regulating Online Content Moderation. Georgetown Law Journal, Vol. 106, Iss. 5, pp. 1353-1388. Available at https://www.law.georgetown.edu/georgetown-law-journal/wp-content/uploads/sites/26/2018/07/Regulating-Online-Content-Moderation.pdf [Accessed 7 December 2021].

5. Brennen B., 2017. Making Sense of Lies, Deceptive Propaganda, and Fake News. Journal of Media Ethics, [online] Vol. 32, No. 3. Available at https://epublications.marquette.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1491&context=comm_fac [Accessed 7 December 2021].

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3