Parental kidnapping as a form of abuse of parental rights

Author:

Yushkevych O. G.ORCID,Burdin M. Yu.ORCID

Abstract

The article explores the legal phenomenon of “parental kidnapping”. It is noted that Ukrainian legislation lacks a definition of this legal phenomenon. The author suggests understanding parental kidnapping as the action of one of the parents regarding the unauthorized change of the child’s place of residence without the consent of the other parent with whom, according to the law or a court decision, the child resides. This includes abduction, leading to a violation of the child’s rights and causing material or non-material harm. Statistical data from the Secretariat of the Commissioner for Human Rights of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine for 2022–2023 regarding the number of parental requests for the unauthorized change of the child’s place of residence by one of the parents is provided. The legislative regulation of this legal phenomenon and the peculiarities of holding parents accountable for such abuse of parental rights in Ukraine are analyzed. Ukrainian legal practitioners categorize the actions falling under the concept of “parental kidnapping” as domestic violence against the child in the form of psychological violence, especially towards the other parent with whom the child lived before the abduction. In cases where there are signs of physical injuries on the child, physical violence against the abducted child is also considered. The legal positions of Ukrainian courts in cases of parental kidnapping are discussed. Generally, since there is no legal provision specifying responsibility for such actions, in cases where the evidence presented by the plaintiff parent proves that the other parent changed the child’s place of residence without authorization, the court grants the plaintiff parent’s claim for the return of the child. Proposals are formulated for measures that need to be implemented to prevent, counteract, and legally hold accountable for parental kidnapping.

Publisher

Kharkiv National University of Internal Affairs

Reference8 articles.

1. Stefanchuk, M. O. (2008). Limits of exercising subjective civil rights. Alerta; KNT; Center of Educational Literature.

2. Karnaukh, B. (2020). Abuse of right and its legal consequences. Entrepreneurship, Economy and Law, 9, 31–36. https://doi.org/10.32849/2663-5313/2020.9.06.

3. Osadchuk, S., & Оsadchuk, N. (2016). Forms of Abuse of Civil Law. Actual Problems of Law, 4(8), 68–77.

4. Rieznikova, V. V. (2013). Abuse of Law: Notion and Characteristics. University Scientific Notes, 1(45), 23–35.

5. Danylenko, T. (2022, February 14). Parental kidnapping, or the sad routine of lawyers at Family Law. Legal newspaper online. https://yur-gazeta.com/dumka-eksperta/batkivskiy-kidneping-abo-sumna-budennist-roboti-advokativ-u-family-law.html.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3