Do We Need a New Leadership Paradigm Due to Covid-19?

Author:

Claus Lisbeth1

Affiliation:

1. Professor of Management and Global HR, Willamette University MBA, Salem, Oregon, USA ; Email: lclaus@willamette.edu

Abstract

Explores whether the changing context of COVID-19 requires new leadership skills in organizations and, perhaps even, a new context-specific leadership theory. Fourteen professional blogs and reports related to leadership skills and practices in response to COVID-19, published in the professional online literature during the height of the pandemic (March 16 - December 20, 2020) were reviewed in terms of suggested new leadership style dimensions and contrasted with the tenets of existing academic leadership theories. The proponents of an emerging leadership style advocate that in dealing with the pandemic, leaders must be able to manage their organizations in turbulent times, lead a distributed workforce of individuals and teams, and become a resilient leader themselves. Synthesis: The analysis suggests the leadership dimensions called for during the pandemic were already present in transformational leadership theories (e.g., authentic, shared feminine, servant and crisis leadership theories) but that the pandemic provided the structural break accelerating the existing transformational leadership paradigm. COVID-19 also confirmed leadership matters and the command-and-control leadership style—still prevalent in many of our top-down bureaucratic organizations—is outdated.

Publisher

FOREX Publication

Subject

General Medicine

Reference64 articles.

1. Gans, H. (2016). The Disruption Dilemma. Cambridge: The MIT Press.

2. Claus, L. & Monaghan, D. (2019). White Paper: Dynamic Open Talent. A Template for Developing, Implementing, Supporting, and Measuring a Dynamic Open Talent (DOT) Strategy for a Global Company. Redmond, WA: Global HR Consortium/IT Roundtable.

3. Carlyle, T. (1870). On Heroes, Hero-Worship and the Heroic in History. London: Chapman and Hall.

4. Galton, F. (1865). Hereditary Talent and Character. Macmillan’s Magazine 12: 157-66 & 318-27.

5. Ghiselli, E. (1959). Traits Differentiating Management Personnel. Personnel Psychology, 12: 535-544; Ghiselli, E. (1963). Managerial talent. American Psychologist, 18: 631-642.

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3