Parallel Mirrors Based Marine Predator Optimization Algorithm with Deep Learning Model for Quality and Shelf-Life Prediction of Shrimp
-
Published:2023-04-30
Issue:2
Volume:11
Page:262-271
-
ISSN:2347-470X
-
Container-title:International Journal of Electrical and Electronics Research
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:IJEER
Affiliation:
1. Department of CSE, Vel Tech Rangarajan Dr. Sagunthala R & D Institute of Science and Technology, Avadi, Chennai, India
Abstract
Automatic classification and assessment of shrimp freshness plays a major role in aquaculture industry. Shrimp is one of the highly perishable seafood, because of its flavor and excellent nutritional content. Given the high amount of industrial production, determining the freshness of shrimp quickly and precisely is difficult. Instead of using feature-engineering-based techniques, a novel hybrid classification approach is proposed by combining the strength of convolutional neural networks (CNN) and Marine Predators Algorithm (MPA) for shrimp freshness diagnosis. In order to choose the best hyperparameter values, marine predator algorithm is improved using Parallel Mirrors Technique (PMPA). The proposed methodology employs a pretrained CNN model termed EfficientNet (ENet), which is combined with the PMPA algorithm to form the PMPA-ENet architecture. The proposed approach yields high performance while also reducing computational complexity. The result showed that proposed model achieved an accuracy and F-score of 98.62% and 97.25% for assessment of freshness in shrimp. PMPA's effectiveness in determining optimal values is compared to four different meta-heuristic algorithms hybridized with ENet including Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO), Simple Genetic Algorithm (SGA), Whale Optimization Algorithm (WOA), and traditional Marine Predator Algorithm (MPA). The results indicated that PMPA-ENet algorithm provides better classification compared with other algorithms
Publisher
FOREX Publication
Subject
Electrical and Electronic Engineering,Engineering (miscellaneous)
Reference27 articles.
1. Zhuhua Hu, Ruoqing Li, Xin Xia, Chuang Yu, Xiang Fan, Yaochi Zhao (2020), “A method overview in smart aquaculture”, Environment Monitoring and Assessment, 192(8) : 3-25, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-020-08409-9 2. Vo, Thi Thu Em, Hyeyoung Ko, Jun-Ho Huh, and Yonghoon Kim. (2021). "Overview of Smart Aquaculture System: Focusing on Applications of Machine Learning and Computer Vision", Electronics 10(22): 2882. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics10222882 3. Nirmal, N.P., Santivarangkna, C., Rajput, M.S. and Benjakul, S., “Trends in shrimp processing waste utilization: An industrial prospective”,Trends in Food Science & Technology, 103, pp.20-35.2020. 4. Asche, F., Anderson, J.L., Botta, R., Kumar, G., Abrahamsen, E.B., Nguyen, L.T. and Valderrama, D., “The economics of shrimp disease”, Journal of invertebrate pathology, 186, p.107, 2021. 5. Zhao, M., Yao, D., Li, S., Zhang, Y. and Aweya, J.J., “Effects of ammonia on shrimp physiology and immunity: a review”, Reviews in Aquaculture, 12(4), pp.2194-2211, 2020.
|
|