Optimizing Current Injection Technique for Enhancing Resistivity Method
-
Published:2024-02-05
Issue:1
Volume:12
Page:99-110
-
ISSN:2347-470X
-
Container-title:International Journal of Electrical and Electronics Research
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:IJEER
Author:
Nurpadillah Sifa1, Cahyadi Willy Anugrah2, Mukhtar Husneni2, Susanto Kusnahadi3, Ikhsan Akhmad Fauzi1, Nurdin Agung Ihwan1
Affiliation:
1. Department of Electrical Engineering, Universitas Garut, Indonesia 2. School of Electrical Engineering, Telkom University, Indonesia 3. Department of Geophysics, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Padjadjaran University, Indonesia
Abstract
Geo-electrical resistivity methods are widely used in various fields and have significant applications in scientific and practical research. Despite the widespread use of resistivity methods, current injection is a critical step in the process of resistivity methods, and the quality of current injection significantly impacts the accuracy of the resistivity measurements. One primary challenge is optimizing current injection techniques to enhance resistivity methods. The developed current injector model for the resistivity meter instrument enhances performance by increasing the voltage source to 400 Volts, extending measurement coverage. It provides three injection current options, 0.5A, 0.8A, and 1A, for efficient accumulator use, considering electrode distances and estimating earth resistance using Contact Resistance Measurement (CRM) to estimate the earth resistance. CRM mode ensures proper electrode connection before injection, thus improving measurement efficiency. The embedded TTGO LoRa ESP32 SX1276 facilitates wireless communication over 1.5 km, addressing challenges in remote and internet-limited areas. The model demonstrates reliability, validity, and durability in CRM mode and current injection measurement. Regarding reliability, we determine the relative error of the model by carrying out measurements repeatedly. In lab-scale testing, the average Relative Error in CRM mode is 0.65%, and in earth resistance measurement testing, it is 1.58%. These relative errors are below the 2% maximum error applied in the “Supersting”, a commercial resistivity instrument. The model's validity is defined by comparing the model with the measuring instrument; we have absolute error. In lab scale testing, the average Absolute Error in CRM mode is 3.08%, and in earth resistance measurement testing, it is 3.73%. The model's durability is tested by injecting current for a minute. After one minute of current injection, the power resistor component's temperature is stable at 30°C.
Publisher
FOREX Publication
Reference60 articles.
1. Kirsch, R.; Yaramanci, U. Geoelectrical methods. Groundwater Geophysics. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2006, ISBN 978-3-540-29383-5. 2. Rolia, E.; Sutjiningsih, D. Application of geoelectric method for groundwater exploration from surface (A literature study). AIP Conf. Proc., 2018, 1977, p.020018. 3. Feranie, S; Putri, A.P.W; Handiman, A.K.P; Tohari, A. Recent development in the use of geoelectric resistivity for landslide surveys: an overview, Gravity J., 2023, 9, p. 130-143. 4. Yohandri, M; Akmam, Development of a Digital Resistivity Meter Based on Microcontroller. TENCON IEEE Region 10 Conference, 2018, pp. 0551-0554. 5. Adler, J.; Ginting, S. L. B.; Abdullah, A. R. A.; Akhbar, A. The Design of Resistivity Tool for Subsurface Based on Microcontroller. IOP Conf. Ser.: Mater. Sci. Eng., 2018, 407, p012123.
|
|