Analysis of Students' Misconception on General Biology Concepts Using Four-Tier Diagnostic Test (FTDT)

Author:

Trio Ageng Prayitno ,Nuril Hidayati

Abstract

This research aims to determine the percentage of students' misconception on general biology concepts using the Four-Tier Diagnostic Test (FTDT). This research method is descriptive research. The research sample was 100 students from IKIP Budi Utomo, Universitas Nusantara PGRI Kediri, and Universitas PGRI Madiun. The research instrument is the FTDT question. The data collection techniques by distributing FTDT questions via Google Form to students using WhatsApp. The data analysis technique was done by quantitative descriptive. The results showed that 25% of students understood the concept, 39% of students had misconception, 23% of students guessed the answer, and 13% of students lack knowledge. The lowest student misconception on the concept of structure and function at all levels of biological organization is 20% and the highest misconception on the concept of the definition of biology is 65%. While the sequence of the third category of students' highest misconception is 65% misconception, 11% false positive, and 12% false negative. The results of this study are important to provide advice to lecturers when teaching general biology to always provide correct information, valid reading sources, valid learning media, and appropriate learning models so that there are no misconceptions among students.

Funder

#

Publisher

Indonesia Approach Education

Subject

General Medicine

Reference39 articles.

1. Ang, L. H., & Shahrill, M. (2014). Identifying students’ specific misconceptions in learning probability. International Journal of Probability and Statistics, 3(2), 23–29. https://doi.org/10.5923/j.ijps.20140302.01

2. Bekkink, M. O., Donders, A. R. T. R., Kooloos, J. G., De Waal, R. M. W., & Ruiter, D. J. (2016). Uncovering students’ misconceptions by assessment of their written questions. BMC (Medical Education), 16(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-016-0739-5

3. Belk, C., & Maier, V. B. (2013). Biology, science for life with physiology, fourth edition, pearson education. The United States of America: Pearson Education.

4. Budiarto, M. T., Khabibah, S., & Firdaus, A. M. (2020). Misconception of junior high school students on two-dimentional figure materials. Daya Matematis: Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Matematika, 8(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.26858/jds.v8i1.13316

5. Çimer, A. (2012). What makes biology learning difficult and effective: Students’ views. Educational Research and Reviews, 7(3), 61–71. https://doi.org/10.5897/ERR11.205

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3