Abstract
Objective: This research aims to describe the results of students' critical thinking in three different junior high schools. This research was conducted using a quantitative descriptive method in which the data obtained were the results of the critical thinking of male and female Grade VIII students from three different junior high schools in Pamekasan, namely in the Tlanakan, Galis, and Larangan areas using thinking indicators. Fionce's Critical Thinking on Narcotics, Psychotropics, and Other Addictive Substances, Fionce's critical thinking indicators are as follows Interpretation, Analysis, Evaluation, Conclusion, Explanation, and Self-Regulation Methods: The method used in this study was to have students work on five critical thinking essay questions by taking random samples. Results: From the three junior high schools, a sample of 50 students was obtained, namely 25 male and 25 female students. After the students worked on the questions, the average male student scored 62.56, and the female student scored 65.28. Novelty: From the results obtained, it was found that the average score of female students was higher than that of male students from three different schools based on an analysis of the Fionce indicators where female students tended to give more detailed and thorough answers than male students. The second reason female students have higher critical thinking skills than male students is that the answers given by male students tend to be different from the topics in the questions given by the researcher.
Publisher
Indonesia Approach Education
Reference40 articles.
1. Afifah, S. A., & Agoestanto, A. (2020). Mathematical critical thinking ability in solving open-ended questions viewed from students curiosity. Unnes : Journal of Mathematics Education, 9(1), 36-42. https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.12-10-2019.2296534
2. Arisoy, B., & Aybek, B. (2021). The effects of subject-based critical thinking education in mathematics on students’ critical thinking skills and virtues. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 21(92), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.14689/ejer.2021.92.6
3. Arsy, H. I., Prasetyo, A. P. B., & Subali, B. (2019). Predict-observe-explain strategy with group investigation effect on students critical thinking skills and learning achievement. Journal of Primary Education, 8(4), 75-83.
4. Bellaera, L., Weinstein, Y., Ilie, S., & Baker, S. T. (2021). Critical thinking in practice: the priorities and practices of instructors teaching in higher education. Journal Thinking Journal Skills and Creativity, 41, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2021.100856
5. Bezanilla, M. J., Fernández-Nogueira, D., Poblete, M., & Galindo-Domínguez, H. (2019). Methodologies for teaching-learning critical thinking in higher education: The teacher’s view. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 33, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2019.100584
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献