An Evaluation of a Surveillance System for Patients Discharged from the Acute Psychiatry Unit in Southern Tasmania

Abstract

Objectives: The aim is to evaluate the current community follow-up, or health surveillance, system for patients discharged from the acute psychiatry unit into the community in southern Tasmania. Method: We developed a conceptual model which considered community mental health follow-up as analogous to an epidemiological surveillance system. The surveillance system was evaluated by prospectively following recorded contacts between the system and a cohort of 100 patients consecutively discharged from the acute psychiatry unit. Main outcome measures were attendance at follow-up appointments, patient re-engagement and hospital readmission. Results: There is no formal system of follow-up and no policy relating to non-attenders of follow-up appointments after psychiatric hospitalisation. There is no defined role for private medical practitioners and agencies in the community. Of the 97 patients considered to need community follow-up, 11 patients were lost to follow-up after 3 months, while another 15 remained in the system because of hospital readmission. Afurther seven patients returned to the system during the following 2 years (six in year 1 and one in year 2) due to readmission. There is appropriate policy about the content and timing of discharge summaries; most summaries were sent promptly. Conclusions: After discharge from the acute psychiatric unit, there was inadequate community follow-up of those patients for whom follow-up was considered necessary. Research is needed to determine whether increased patient follow-up is beneficial. Stakeholders should decide whether formal follow-up or health surveillance is necessary.