Ethics in Community Psychiatry

Author:

Szmukler George1

Affiliation:

1. Bethlem and Maudsley NHS Trust, Denmark Hill, London, SE5 8AZ, United Kingdom

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this paper is to clarify the ethical challenges resulting from new models of community psychiatry and to examine practical approaches aimed at meeting them. Method: Review of the literature and observations both as clinician and medical director of community services. Results: Assertive community treatment presents ethical dilemmas relating to privacy, confidentiality, ‘coercion’ and conflicts of duty to the patient versus others, including carers and the wider community. Their acuity is influenced by the context in which services are provided, especially community fears of the consequences of care in the community for the severely mentally ill. Approaches to resolving ethical problems include increasing patient involvement in their care, clarifying the grounds for ‘paternalistic’ interventions, and re-examining grounds for acting to reduce the risk of harm to others. Conclusions: The ethical dilemmas are not new, but they present in sufficiently different guises to warrant reconsideration in their new context. There has been a reluctance to face them, but if community psychiatric practice is to survive, it must rest on a sound ethical base.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Psychiatry and Mental health,General Medicine

Cited by 28 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Persuasion or coercion? An empirical ethics analysis about the use of influence strategies in mental health community care;BMC Health Services Research;2022-10-21

2. HUMAN RIGHTS OF MENTALLY ILL PATIENTS;Mental Health: Global Challenges Journal;2019-11-19

3. What Works;The Wiley Handbook on What Works for Offenders with Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities;2019-10-07

4. Shared Decision-Making and Self-Directed Care;The Palgrave Handbook of American Mental Health Policy;2019-05-08

5. Le suivi intensif dans la communauté et la consommation : quelques enjeux éthiques;Drogues, santé et société;2016-10-21

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3