Affiliation:
1. Bethlem and Maudsley NHS Trust, Denmark Hill, London, SE5 8AZ, United Kingdom
Abstract
Objective: The aim of this paper is to clarify the ethical challenges resulting from new models of community psychiatry and to examine practical approaches aimed at meeting them. Method: Review of the literature and observations both as clinician and medical director of community services. Results: Assertive community treatment presents ethical dilemmas relating to privacy, confidentiality, ‘coercion’ and conflicts of duty to the patient versus others, including carers and the wider community. Their acuity is influenced by the context in which services are provided, especially community fears of the consequences of care in the community for the severely mentally ill. Approaches to resolving ethical problems include increasing patient involvement in their care, clarifying the grounds for ‘paternalistic’ interventions, and re-examining grounds for acting to reduce the risk of harm to others. Conclusions: The ethical dilemmas are not new, but they present in sufficiently different guises to warrant reconsideration in their new context. There has been a reluctance to face them, but if community psychiatric practice is to survive, it must rest on a sound ethical base.
Subject
Psychiatry and Mental health,General Medicine
Cited by
28 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Persuasion or coercion? An empirical ethics analysis about the use of influence strategies in mental health community care;BMC Health Services Research;2022-10-21
2. HUMAN RIGHTS OF MENTALLY ILL PATIENTS;Mental Health: Global Challenges Journal;2019-11-19
3. What Works;The Wiley Handbook on What Works for Offenders with Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities;2019-10-07
4. Shared Decision-Making and Self-Directed Care;The Palgrave Handbook of American Mental Health Policy;2019-05-08
5. Le suivi intensif dans la communauté et la consommation : quelques enjeux éthiques;Drogues, santé et société;2016-10-21