First-Episode Mania: A Neglected Priority for Early Intervention

Author:

Conus Philippe1,Conus Philippe1,Mcgorry Patrick D1

Affiliation:

1. Early Psychosis Prevention and Intervention Centre, Locked Bag 10, Parkville, Victoria, 3052, Australia

Abstract

Objective: While first-episode (FE) psychosis has become an important field of research, FE affective psychoses, and mania in particular, have been relatively neglected. This paper summarizes current knowledge about FE mania and explores the potential for early intervention. Method: The main computerized psychiatric literature databases were accessed. Results: When functional as well as symptomatic variables are considered, the outcome of mania is not as good as was formerly believed, a characteristic which is already present from the first episode. Various factors (lower socio-economic status, younger age at onset of illness, poor adherence to treatment, presence of comorbidity) have been identified as possible predictors of poor outcome. The prognostic value of the presence of psychotic symptoms and their congruence to mood, as well as the diagnostic subgroup, is less well established. This literature review also reveals striking similarities between manic and schizophreniform first episodes. Poor functional outcome in a significant proportion of patients following the first episode, high risk of suicide, high prevalence of comorbid diagnoses, worse outcome with a younger age at onset and with longer delay until treatment is initiated, and finally early presence of neuro-anatomical changes, are observed in both syndromes. Conclusions: This pattern justifies the development of early intervention strategies for FE manic patients and supports more exploratory research to identify prodromal symptoms, which might ultimately lead to even earlier focus on preventive interventions.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Psychiatry and Mental health,General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3