International comparison of quality indicators in United States, Icelandic and Canadian nursing facilities

Author:

Jensdóttir A. B.,Rantz M.,Hjaltadóttir I.,Guđmundsdòttir H.,Rook M.,Grando V.

Abstract

AbstractAim: To discuss the results of a comparison using minimum data set (MDS)‐based quality indicators (QIs) for residents in nursing facilities in three countries (Iceland; Ontario, Canada; and Missouri, United States) together with implications regarding nursing practices and resident outcomes in these countries. Method: Data were extracted from databases in each country for four consecutive quarterly periods during 1997 and 1998. All facilities investigated had the required consecutive quarterly data. Analytical techniques were matched to measure resident outcomes using the same MDS‐based QIs in the three countries. Results: Similarities among the three countries included the use of nine or more multiple medications, weight loss, urinary tract infection, dehydration, and behavioural symptoms that affect others. Differences among the three countries included bowel and bladder incontinence, indwelling catheter use, fecal impaction, tube feeding use, development of pressure ulcers, bedridden residents, physical restraint use, depression without receiving antidepressant therapy, residents with depression, use of anti‐anxiety or hypnotic drugs, use of anti‐psychotic drugs in the absence of psychotic and related conditions, residents spending little or no time in activities, and falls. Conclusions: Comparisons highlighted differences in clinical practices among countries, which may account for differences in resident outcomes. Learning from each other's best practices can improve the quality of care for older people in nursing homes in many countries.

Publisher

Wiley

Reference10 articles.

1. Approaching Cross-National Comparisons of Nursing Home Residents

2. Making the most of quality indicator information

3. International and Regional Variations in Restraint Use: Implications for Selecting Benchmarks;Hirdes J.P.;Canadian Journal of Quality in Healthcare,1998

4. Using Indicators To Structure Quality Improvement Initiatives in Long-Term Care

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.7亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2025 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3