Quality of life after total colectomy with ileorectal anastomosis or proctocolectomy and ileal pouch—anal anastomosis for familial adenomatous polyposis

Author:

van Duijvendijk P1,Slors J F M1,Taat C W1,Oosterveld P2,Sprangers M A G2,Obertop H1,Vasen H F A3

Affiliation:

1. Department of Surgery, Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

2. Department of Medical Psychology, Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

3. Department of Gastroenterology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands

Abstract

Abstract Background Knowledge of postoperative health status is important in decision-making about the type of operation necessary in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP). This study compared the quality of life (QoL) between patients with an ileorectal anastomosis (group 1) and those with an ileal pouch–anal anastomosis (group 2). Methods QoL was assessed with both a generic questionnaire (Short Form-36 Health Survey; SF-36) and a disease-specific questionnaire (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Colorectal QoL Questionnaire; EORTC QLQ-CR38). The SF-36 consists of 36 items representing eight generic health domains, and the EORTC QLQ-CR38 comprises 38 items representing disease-specific health domains. Both questionnaires were distributed among 323 patients with FAP known at the Dutch Polyposis Registry who had previously undergone either operation. The results of the SF-36 were compared with the scores of age- and sex-matched respondents from the general population. Results Some 279 patients (86 per cent), 161 in group 1 and 118 in group 2, completed the questionnaire. Generic and disease-specific QoL was the same for groups 1 and 2. The SF-36 scores of both groups were significantly lower than those of the general population. Conclusion There were no differences with respect to health status between patients in groups 1 and 2, and preference for either procedure cannot be based on QoL.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Surgery

Cited by 75 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3