Pain from primary inguinal hernia and the effect of repair on pain

Author:

Page B1,Paterson C1,Young D1,O'Dwyer P J1

Affiliation:

1. University Department of Surgery, Western Infirmary and Robertson Centre for Biostatistics, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK

Abstract

Abstract Background No previous study has attempted to quantify pain from a primary inguinal hernia. The aim of this study was to quantify patients' pain from inguinal hernia at rest and on moving, and to assess the effect of hernia repair on the pain. Methods Linear analogue pain scores at rest and on moving were recorded before operation and at 1 year after surgery in a consecutive series of patients undergoing elective repair of a primary inguinal hernia. Results During the study period 323 patients underwent inguinal hernia repair. Eighty-six patients (26·6 per cent) recorded no pain at rest from the hernia, and 174 (53·9 per cent) had mild pain only (score less than 10). On moving, 53 patients (16·4 per cent) had no pain and 137 (42·4 per cent) had mild pain on moving. Only 1·5 per cent experienced severe pain (score greater than 50) at rest, and 10·2 per cent had severe pain on moving. There was no association between pain and hernia type, direct or indirect, or patient occupation. One year after operation only 24·5 per cent of patients had no pain from the hernia repair site at rest, and 21·6 per cent had no pain from the site on moving. Overall there was a significant reduction in pain score at rest (mean(s.e.m.) decrease from baseline −2·9(1·2), P = 0·019) and on moving (−9·2(1·8), P = 0·001) compared with preoperative values, and this was due mainly to the large effect observed in patients with high preoperative values. Patients who had no pain at rest before operation had significant pain scores at rest at 1 year (P = 0·001). Conclusion Clinical trials are required to evaluate hernia repair in patients with an asymptomatic inguinal hernia. Results from such trials should help to determine whether repair is the treatment of choice for these patients.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Surgery

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3