Endoscopic resection of large sessile colonic polyps by specialist and non-specialist endoscopists

Abstract

Abstract Background Patients with large sessile colonic polyps for which endoscopic resection might be feasible are often referred directly for operation. The aim of this study was to determine the outcome of patients with such polyps diagnosed by specialist and non-specialist colonoscopists. Methods Patients with large (greater than 2 cm) sessile polyps detected at colonoscopy from January 1995 to July 2000 were identified. Resection technique and clinical and endoscopic outcomes were recorded. Two of the colonoscopists (B.P.S., C.B.W.) are recognized as specialists. Results Some 130 polyps were identified, 100 detected by either of two specialist endoscopists (including 14 cancers) and 30 by 14 non-specialist endoscopists (including ten cancers). Endoscopic resection of benign polyps was attempted by experts in 80 (93 per cent) of 86 cases and by non-experts in 15 of 20 cases (P = 0·03), with successful management by endoscopy alone in 61 (76 per cent) of 80 and in six of 15 cases respectively (P = 0·01). Complications occurred following three polypectomies performed by an expert (bleeding, two; pain, one) and one by a non-expert (bleeding). The estimated end-cost of management by specialists was less than half of that by non-specialists. Conclusion Endoscopic resection of large sessile colonic polyps is feasible in the majority of patients and should be considered as first-line therapy. Prompt referral to a specialist endoscopist may improve outcomes by avoiding operation or enabling complete excision at a single endoscopy session.