Prospective randomized multicentre study of laparoscopic versus open appendicectomy

Author:

Hellberg A1,Rudberg C1,Kullman E2,Enochsson L3,Fenyö G3,Graffner H4,Hallerbäck B5,Johansson B5,Anderberg B2,Wenner J4,Ringqvist I6,Sörensen S6

Affiliation:

1. Department of Surgery, Central Hospital, Västerås, Sweden

2. Department of Surgery, University Hospital of Linköping, Sweden

3. Department of Surgery, Nacka Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden

4. Department of Surgery, Hospital of Helsingborg, Sweden

5. Department of Surgery, Northern Älvsborg County Hospital Trollhättan, Sweden

6. Department of Research, Central Hospital, Västerås, Sweden

Abstract

Abstract Background A prospective randomized multicentre study was performed to compare the outcome of laparoscopic and open appendicectomy in patients with suspected acute appendicitis. Methods A total of 523 patients was randomized, but because of 23 withdrawals the outcome in 500 patients is reported, 244 in the laparoscopic group and 256 in the open group. Results Patients having laparoscopic appendicectomy recovered more quickly than those having open surgery (13 versus 21 days, P < 0·001). There was no significant difference in duration of sick leave after operation (laparoscopic group 11 days versus open group 14 days). Postoperative pain (at 24 h, 7 days and 14 days) was less after laparoscopic operations and a functional index 1 week after operation was more favourable in these patients (P< 0·001). Operating time was significantly longer in the laparoscopic group (60 versus 35 min, P< 0·01). Hospital stay and complications did not differ between the groups. Thirty laparoscopic procedures (12 per cent) were converted to open appendicectomy. Conclusion Laparoscopic appendicectomy is as safe as open appendicectomy and has the advantage of allowing a quicker recovery.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Surgery

Reference34 articles.

1. Perforating inflammation of the vermiform appendix, with special reference to its early diagnosis and treatment;Fitz;Am J Med,1886

2. Acute appendicitis: a clinical study of 1018 cases of emergency appendectomy;Pieper;Acta Chirurgica Scandinavica,1982

3. The continuing challenge of the negative appendix;Blind;Acta Chirurgica Scandinavica,1986

4. Laparoscopic compared with open appendicectomy for acute appendicitis: a prospective study;Chiarugi;Eur J Surg,1996

5. Acute appendicitis: sonographic criteria based on 250 cases;Jeffrey;Radiology,1988

Cited by 138 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Perioperative pain management for appendicectomy;European Journal of Anaesthesiology;2024-01-12

2. The role of laparoscopy in emergency colorectal surgery;Saudi Medical Journal;2022-12

3. Laparoscopic Appendectomy Translates into Less Analgesics and Faster Return to Work in Asia;JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoscopic & Robotic Surgeons;2022

4. Compare the Outcomes of Laparoscopic and Open Appendectomy;Pakistan Journal of Medical and Health Sciences;2021-07-26

5. Utility of preoperative ‘group and save’ samples in laparoscopic appendicectomy;The Bulletin of the Royal College of Surgeons of England;2020-10

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3