Author:
Muse William Brian,Muse Iryna
Abstract
<p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:Times New Roman,Times,serif"><span style="font-size:16px"><span dir="ltr" lang="EN-US"><span style="color:black">College choice and choice of major are the most important decisions for future earnings. It is still unclear, however, what makes a greater difference—college or major—or whether a choice of college matters more for some majors, but not the others. Using cross-classified models and College Scorecard data, I show that a discipline is more consequential for future earnings than a college. The effect of STEM is substantial but is less pronounced at institutions with higher overall median earnings. The effect of college selectivity on earnings is more pronounced for non-STEM disciplines. Institutional characteristics—such as tuition, shares of graduates receiving different forms of financial aid, institutional size and location, and type of college—correlate with earnings of graduates. Racial and gender composition of an educational program correlate with expected earnings of its graduates even after control for other institutional and disciplinary characteristics. Models presented here provide a better understanding of the effect of college and major choices on future earnings.</span></span></span></span></p>
Reference55 articles.
1. ACT (2018). ACT / SAT Concordance. Retrieved on May 26, 2022 at https://www.act.org/content/act/en/products-and-services/the-act/scores/act-sat-concordance.html
2. Becker, G. S. (1964). Human Capital. New York: Columbia University Press. www.nber.org/books/beck-5
3. Benoit, K. (2011). Linear Regression Models with Logarithmic Transformations. Methodology Institute, London School of Economics, 8p. Retrieved on March 10, 2022 at https://kenbenoit.net/assets/courses/ME104/logmodels2.pdf .
4. Bickel, R. (2007). Multilevel Analysis for Applied Research: It's Just Regression! New York: Guilford Press. https://doi.org/10.3138/cjpe.025.008
5. Black, D.A. and Smith, J.A. (2006). Estimating the Returns to College Quality with Multiple Proxies for Quality. Journal of Labor Economics, 24(3): 701-728. https://doi.org/10.1086/505067