Author:
Mitra Arup,Raushan Rajesh
Abstract
<p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:Times New Roman,Times,serif"><span style="font-size:16px"><span dir="ltr" lang="EN-US"><span style="color:black">Keeping in view the concept of agglomeration economies and the New Economic Geography (NEG) angle, this paper makes an attempt to examine the rural to urban population movement at the district level in India. The findings do not favour a strong positive association between levels of urbanization and migration rates. However, there exists a cluster of districts which are able to attract migrants on a large scale in spite of being already urbanized. The work participation rate, share of services and construction work, and literacy rate all form parts of this positive nexus, indicating that opportunities exist with increased levels of urbanization which in turn prompt people to migrate. The positive spill-over effects of higher levels of urbanization are not limited to the urban spaces only as the adjoining rural areas also seem to have undergone a significant transformation. The land use pattern and activities are changing and some of the developmental impact is evident. However, the regional variations in this respect are evident. There are sharp differences in the relationship between urbanization level and migration rates across regions. The nature of urbanization and its determinants and the outcome variables of urbanization and migration also unravel regional variations. Besides, there are many districts with higher levels of urbanization; yet, they are not able to attract migrants at a rapid pace. New investment opportunities can be created in these spaces to reduce the cost of growth and make employment generation process more effective, facilitating the rural population to take the benefits of agglomeration economies.</span></span></span></span></p>
Reference28 articles.
1. Ahrend, R., Farchy, E., Kaplanis, I., Lembcke, A. C. (2014). What Makes Cities More Productive? Evidence on the Role of Urban Governance from Five OECD Countries. OECD Regional Development Working Papers, no. 2014/05. OECD, Paris. https://doi.org/10.1787/20737009
2. Camagni, R., Capello, R., Caragliu, A. (2016). Static vs. Dynamic Agglomeration Economies: Spatial Context and Structural Evolution behind Urban Growth. Regional Science 95(1): 133–58. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57807-1_12
3. Castells-Quintana, D., Royuela, V. (2017). Malthus Living in a Slum: Urban Concentration, Infrastructures and Economic Growth. Journal of Urban Economics, 98 (issue C), 158-173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jue.2016.02.003
4. Chen, C., Peng, S. (2020). New Economic Geography. Oxford Research Encyclopedias, Economics and Finance. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190625979.013.338
5. Duan, X., Yu, X., Lu, D., Nipper, J. (2010). The Study of New Economic Geography of Krugman and Its Significance. Acta Geographica Sinica, 65(2): 131-138.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献