Affiliation:
1. Regulatory economist/independent consultant, the National Regulatory Research Institute, USA
Abstract
<p><big>To make an assessment of ratemaking proposals, this article proposes that regulators should consider applying a logical decision-making process, such as multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA), that selects or modifies those rate mechanisms that come closest to achieving the public interest, as defined by regulators. MCDA seems like an fitting tool to improve regulatory decisions by making more explicit the relationship between different rate mechanisms and the public interest. This article provides a simplified version of MCDA to demonstrate how regulators can apply this tool to evaluate new rate mechanisms in terms of the public interest. As far as the author knows, the MCDA methodology applied to utility ratemaking has not appeared in the literature. While regulators may not want to or lack the resources to execute all the steps presented in this article, MCDA can provide direction to regulators in evaluating different rate mechanisms and ultimately reaching decisions that are more rational and aligned with the public interest. After all, evaluating rate mechanisms is one of the major functions of utility regulators. Doing it wrongly can have a consequential effect on society’s welfare.</big></p>
Reference51 articles.
1. Bonbright, James C., et al. (1988). Principles of Public Utility Rates, 2nd Edition, Public Utilities Reports, Inc.
2. the first edition, authored solely by Bonbright, was published in 1961. https://www.amazon.com/Principles-Public-Utility-Rates-Bonbright/dp/0910325235
3. Borenstein, Severin and James Bushnell (2015). “The U.S. Electricity Industry after 20 Years of Restructuring.” NBER Working Paper Series, Working Paper 21113, April. https://www.nber.org/papers/w21113
4. The Brattle Group (2013). Alternative Regulation and Ratemaking Approaches for Water Companies: Supporting the Capital Investment Needs of 21st Century, prepared for the National Association of Water Companies, September 23.https://www.brattle.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/6135_alternative_regulation_and_ratemaking_approaches_for_water_companies_wharton_villadsen_bishop_nawc_sep_23_2013.pdf
5. Burger, Scott P. et al. (2019). “The Efficiency and Distributional Effects of Alternative Residential Electricity Rate Design.” NBER Working Paper Series, Working Paper 25570, February. https://www.nber.org/papers/w25570