Gross Domestic Products (GDP) is not a Proper Indicator of Measurement and Economic Power Comparison for Emerging Economies: A Judgement from International Distributions of Net Factor Income from Abroad

Author:

Qiu Dong1,Wang Yafei2

Affiliation:

1. School of Statistics, Jiangxi University of Finance and Economics, Nanchang, China

2. School of Statistics, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China

Abstract

<p>Global distributions of net factor income from abroad (NFI) during 1990-2019 have witnessed that (1) the United States is the top one country accounting for 40% of surpluses of the global total, while a surge in China&rsquo;s deficit with its GDP increase; (2) GDP growth in emerging economies has a price scissors with NFI deficits; (3) asymmetric NFI has covered up the severity of rich countries&rsquo; global arbitrages especially from emerging economies; (4) China&rsquo;s economic power is exaggerated by the PPP-based GDP implemented by the World Bank. It concludes that (1) developing countries have paid for huge hidden cost for their emergence; (2) the statement of the United States suffering losses absolutely does not hold; (3) GDP is not a universal tool for measuring what matters. It suggests that (1) emerging economies countries should beware of the potential misleading of GDP on economic measurement and economic power comparison ; (2) GDP should be critiqued from the applicability perspective of economies&rsquo; types; (3) it is urgent to clarify some misjudgment and misleading concepts in the economic affairs surrounding the global value chain patterns; (4) the construction of national governance capacity in emerging economies should focus on &ldquo;social infrastructure&rdquo;, of which one of the important parts is an effective economic statistics system; (5) emerging economies should carry out the strategic layout of international economic statistics talents to enhance their soft powers.</p>

Publisher

Anser Press Pte. Ltd.

Reference11 articles.

1. Berndt, E. R., J. E. Triplett, I. Conference on Research in, and C. Wealth. 50th Anniversary. (1990). Fifty Years of Economic Measurement: the Jubilee of the Conference on Research in Income and Wealth. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

2. Carson, C. S. (1975). The History of the United States National Income and Product Accounts: The Development of an Analytical Tool. Review of Income and Wealth 21 (2):153-181.

3. Jorgenson, D. W., J. S. Landefeld, and P. Schreyer. (2014). Measuring Economic Sustainability and Progress. edited by N. B. o. E. Research. 72 vols. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

4. Qiu, D. and D. Li. (2019). Logical Mining of Economic Measurement: Difficulities and Principles, Criticism Series of Contemporary Economic Statistics. Salt Lake City: American Academic Press.

5. Qiu, D. and Y. F. Wang. (2020). A Public Product Perspective of China's National Acounts Evolution: Mode Selection, Knowledge Production and System Construction. Journal of Statistics and Information 35 (01):3-13.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3