Abstract
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;"><span style="font-size: 14pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times, serif;"><strong><span lang="EN-US">Purpose:</span></strong><span lang="EN-US"> To realize the benefits a Quality Management System (QMS), an organization needs to effectively implement its principles. This includes embracing these principles within an enabling environment. Hence, organizational structure is a critical success factor for adopting quality management systems. </span><span lang="EN" style="mso-ansi-language: EN;">This paper aims at understanding how the organizational structure impacts ISO 9001 QMS implementation and vise versa, besides exploring how quality management initiatives affect organizational resilience through parts.</span> <span lang="EN-US">Design/methodology/approach: The research deploys a qualitative methodology, with an outsider-insider approach. 32 semi-structured interviews were conducted, plus one final reflective interview. Interview questions dealt with structural constructs: communication, employee engagement, employee empowerment, process/routine-orientation, multidisciplinarity, cross-functionality, expertise-utilization and change-readiness. The questions also dealt with how the organizational structure impacted ISO 9001 implementation and vice versa. <strong>Findings: </strong>The results show that ISO 9001 implementation was more successful and fruitful under process-orientation and to some degree under semi-process orientation, while it looked inconsistent under routine-orientation. This indicates a significant role played by the organizational structure when it comes to ISO 9001 implementation. More importantly, the results also demonstrate that ISO 9001 implementation managed to improve organizational resilience by consistently driving the organizational structure toward higher levels of process-orientation for process-oriented units, whereas it failed to realize such impact for routine-oriented units. <strong>Originality/value:</strong> This study is unique as it is the first - within the reviewed literature - to examine the moderating role of the organizational structure between the ISO 9001 standard and organizational resilience. It draws a roadmap for the successful realization of organizational resilience through quality management systems, considering organizational structure constructs.</span></span></p>
Reference41 articles.
1. ISO 9001 HISTORY [Online]. The British Assessment Bureau. Available: The Ultimate Guide to ISO 9001 | British Assessment Bureau (british-assessment.co.uk)
2. What is ISO 9001:2015 – Quality management systems? American Society for Quality.
3. Adler, P. S., Goldoftas, B. and Levine, D. I. (1999). Flexibility Versus Efficiency? A Case Study of Model Changeovers in the Toyota Production System. Organization Science, 10, 43-68. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.10.1.43
4. Benraad, M., Ozkan, B., Turetken, O. and Vanderfeesten, I. (2022). The influence of BPM-supportive culture and individual process orientation on process conformance. Business Process Management Journal, 28, 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1108/BPMJ-08-2020-0363
5. Crosby, P. B. (1979). Quality is free: the art of making quality certain, New York, New York: McGraw-Hill.