Abstract
An effective economy requires prompt prevention of misconduct of legal entities. With the ever-increasing transaction rate, an important part of this work is finding market collusions based on statistics of electronic traces. We report a solution to this problem based on a quantum-theoretical approach to behavioral modeling. In particular, cognitive states of economic subjects are represented by complex-valued vectors in space formed by the basis of decision alternatives, while decision probabilities are defined by projections of these states to the corresponding directions. Coordination of multilateral behavior then corresponds to entanglement of the joint cognitive state, measured by standard metrics of quantum theory. A high score of these metrics indicates the likelihood of collusion between the considered subjects. The resulting method for collusion discovery was tested with open data on the participation of legal entities in public procurement between 2015 and 2020 available at the federal portal https://zakupki.gov.ru. Quantum models are built for about 80 thousand unique pairs and 10 million unique triples of agents in the obtained dataset. The reliability of collusion discovery was defined by comparison with open data of Federal antimonopoly service available at https://br.fas.gov.ru. The achieved performance allows the discovery of about one-half of known pairwise collusions with a reliability of more than 50%, which is comparable with detection based on classical correlation and mutual information. For three-sided behavior, in contrast, the quantum model is practically the only available option since classical measures are typically limited to the bilateral case. Half of such collusions are detected with a reliability of 40%. The obtained results indicate the efficiency of the quantum-probabilistic approach to modeling economic behavior. The developed metrics can be used as informative features in analytic systems and algorithms of machine learning for this field.
Subject
Artificial Intelligence,Applied Mathematics,Computational Theory and Mathematics,Computational Mathematics,Computer Networks and Communications,Information Systems
Reference82 articles.
1. Ferguson A. Policing predictive policing // Washington University Law Review. 2017. vol. 94. no. 5. p. 1109.
2. Yang F. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Criminology and Criminal Justice // Oxford University Press. 2019. vol. 44. no. 1. pp. 57–61.
3. McDaniel J., Pease K. Predictive Policing and Artificial Intelligence // Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group. 2021. 330 p.
4. Berk R. Artificial Intelligence, Predictive Policing, and Risk Assessment for Law Enforcement // Annual Review of Criminology. 2021. vol. 4. no. 1. pp. 209–237.
5. Официальный сайт Федеральная Антимонопольная служба. URL: fas.gov.ru (дата обращения: 02.09.2022).