A Model for Documenting Requirements Elicitation

Author:

Serna M. EdgarORCID,Serna A. Alexei

Abstract

Context: This work proposes a model to document the elicitation of requirements in the field of Requirements Engineering. Method: A systematic review of the literature was conducted to determine the validity and effectiveness of the existing models for documenting requirements elicitation. Results: By analyzing the results of this review, it was concluded that it is possible – and that is required – to take the best documented practices and add principles from logic, abstraction, and formal methods to them in order to structure a semi-formal model for documenting elicitation. Those currently proposed focus on techniques to collect information and pay little attention to documentation. In addition, these models are mainly based on natural language, which makes their interpretation difficult, and they generate re-processing in later stages of the life cycle due to ambiguities. Conclusions: This article describes a structured model, as well as its application and validation, by comparing it against five models found in the review.

Publisher

Universidad Distrital Francisco Jose de Caldas

Subject

General Engineering,Energy Engineering and Power Technology

Reference40 articles.

1. E. Serna and A. Serna, “La especificación formal en contexto: actual y futuro,” in Serna E., Ed., Métodos Formales, Ingeniería de Requisitos y Pruebas del Software, Medellín, Colombia: Editorial Instituto Antioqueño de Investigación, 2021, pp. 124-138.

2. E. Serna, “Formal methods and Software Engineering,” Rev. Virtual Univ. Católica del Norte, vol. 30, pp. 158-164, 2010.

3. M. Bolstad, “Design by contract: A simple technique for improving the quality of software,” in 31st Annual Int. Symp. Comp. Arch., München, Germany, 2004. https://doi.org/10.1109/DOD_UGC.2004.10

4. E. Serna, “Analysis and selection to requirements elicitation techniques,” in 7th Col. Comp. Cong., Medellín, Colombia, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1109/ColombianCC.2012.6398001

5. A. Davis, P. Davis, and H. Davis, Great software debates, New York, USA: John Wiley & Sons, 2004.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3