Measuring Language Gains in a Foreign Language Context

Author:

Muñoz Restrepo AnaORCID,Valderrama Carvajal IsabelORCID,Lopez Muñoz Alejandra,Avendaño Franco RicardoORCID

Abstract

Learning gain can be defined as the difference between students’ language competences demonstrated at two different points in time. In this article, we reported on a small-scale study aimed at measuring learning gains and piloting the methods chosen. Fourteen students of English as a foreign language participated in the study. We employed a student self-report survey, an oral performance assessment task and a standardised test for data gathering, and we applied them at three different moments during the eight-month study. Our data analysis includes the comparison of percentages rendered by test scores, the estimation of means for oral task scores and grouping and coding for qualitative data in the survey. Results show the gradual pattern of language improvement and the suitability of methods. These results can help stakeholders or policymakers in selecting relevant evidence to improve accountability in decision-making. We have provided conclusions and recommendations below for a larger scale study.

Publisher

Universidad Distrital Francisco Jose de Caldas

Subject

General Medicine

Reference43 articles.

1. Allen, J. (2005). Grades as valid measures of academic achievement of classroom learning. The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 78(5), 218-223.

2. Bachman, L. F., Davidson, F., & Ryan, K. (1995). An investigation into the comparability of two tests of English as a foreign language (Vol. 1). Cambridge University Press.

3. Beretta, A. (1986). Program-fair language teaching program evaluation. TESOL Quarterly, 20(3), 431-444.

4. Bonesronning, H. (1999). The variation in teachers’ grading practices: Causes and consequences. Economics of Education Review, 18(1), 89-105.

5. Breslow, L. (2007). Methods of measuring learning outcomes and value added. Working paper, Teaching and Learning Laboratory: Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Retrieved from https://tll.mit.edu/sites/default/files/guidelines/a-e-tools-methods-of-measuring-learning-outcomes-grid-2.pdf

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3