EXTENT OF RESECTION AND SURVIVAL IN GLIOBLASTOMA MULTIFORME

Author:

,Stummer Walter1,Reulen Hanns-Jürgen2,Meinel Thomas3,Pichlmeier Uwe4,Schumacher Wiebke5,Tonn Jörg-Christian2,Rohde Veit6,Oppel Falk7,Turowski Bernd8,Woiciechowsky Christian9,Franz Kea10,Pietsch Torsten11

Affiliation:

1. Neurochirurgische Klinik, Heinrich-Heine-Universität, Düsseldorf, Germany

2. Neurochirurgische Klinik, Ludwig-Maximilans Universität, Munich, Germany

3. Clinstud Clinical Research Institute, Hamburg, Germany, and Institut für Neuroradiologie, J.W. Goethe Universitätsklinikum, Frankfurt, Germany

4. Medac Gesellschaft für klinische Spezialpräparate mbH, Wedel, Germany

5. Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany

6. Medizinische Einrichrungen der RWTH, Aachen, Germany

7. Krankenanstalten Gilead gGmbH, Bielefeld, Germany

8. Abteilung für Neuroradiologie, Heinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany

9. Neurochirurgische Klinik, Charitè, Campus Virchow, Berlin, Germany

10. Neurochirurgische Klinik, J.W. Goethe Universitätsklinikum, Frankfurt, Germany

11. Institut für Neuropathologie, Universitätsklinikum Bonn, Bonn, Germany

Abstract

Abstract OBJECTIVE The influence of the degree of resection on survival in patients with glioblastoma multiforme is still under discussion. The highly controlled 5-aminolevulinic acid study provided a unique platform for addressing this question as a result of the high frequency of “complete” resections, as revealed by postoperative magnetic resonance imaging scans achieved by fluorescence-guided resection and homogeneous patient characteristics. METHODS Two hundred forty-three patients with glioblastoma multiforme per protocol from the 5-aminolevulinic acid study were analyzed. Patients with complete and incomplete resections as revealed by early magnetic resonance imaging scans were compared. Prognostic factors that might cause bias regarding resection and influence survival (e.g., tumor size, edema, midline shift, location, age, Karnofsky Performance Scale score, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score) were used for analysis of overall survival. Time to reintervention (chemotherapy, reoperation) was analyzed further to exclude bias regarding second-line therapies. RESULTS Treatment bias was identified in patients with complete (n = 122) compared with incomplete resection (n = 121), i.e., younger age and less frequent eloquent tumor location. Other factors, foremost preoperative tumor size, were identical. Patients without residual tumor survived longer (16.7 versus 11.8 mo, P < 0.0001). In multivariate analysis, only residual tumor, age, and Karnofsky Performance Scale score were significantly prognostic. To account for distribution bias, patients were stratified for age (>60 or ≤60 yr) and eloquent location. Survival advantages from complete resection remained significant within subgroups, and age/eloquent location were no longer unevenly distributed. Reinterventions occurred marginally earlier in patients with residual tumor (6.7 versus 9.5 mo, P = 0.0582). CONCLUSION Treatment bias was demonstrated regarding resection and second-line therapies. However, bias and imbalances were controllable in the cohorts available from the 5-aminolevulinic acid study so that the present data now provide Level 2b evidence (Oxford Centre for Evidence-based Medicine) that survival depends on complete resection of enhancing tumor in glioblastoma multiforme.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Clinical Neurology,Surgery

Reference17 articles.

1. Ensuring reliability of outcome measures in multicentre clinical trials of treatments for acute ischemic stroke;Albanese;The program developed for the Trial of Org 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment (TOAST). Stroke,1994

2. Early postoperative magnetic resonance imaging after resection of malignant glioma: Objective evaluation of residual tumor and its influence on regrowth and prognosis;Albert;Neurosurgery,1994

3. Radiation response and survival time in patients with glioblastoma multiforme;Barker FG 2nd, Prados;J Neurosurg,1996

4. Interrater reliability of the NIH stroke scale;Goldstein;Arch Neurol,1989

5. Extent of resection as a prognostic variable in the treatment of gliomas;Hess;J Neurooncol,1999

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3