Deep Brain Stimulation for Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder

Author:

Hamani Clement1,Pilitsis Julie2,Rughani Anand I.3,Rosenow Joshua M.4,Patil Parag G.5,Slavin Konstantin S.6,Abosch Aviva7,Eskandar Emad8,Mitchell Laura S.9,Kalkanis Steven910

Affiliation:

1. Division of Neurosurgery, Toronto Western Hospital, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

2. Department of Neurosurgery and Center for Neuropharmacology and Neuroscience, Albany Medical College, Albany, New York

3. Neuroscience Institute, Maine Medical Center, Portland, Maine

4. Department of Neurosurgery, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois

5. Departments of Neurosurgery, Neurology, Anesthesiology, and Biomedical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan

6. Department of Neurosurgery, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois

7. Department of Neurosurgery, University of Colorado, Denver, Colorado

8. Department of Neurosurgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts

9. Congress of Neurological Surgeons, Guidelines Department, Schaumburg, Illinois

10. Department of Neurosurgery, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, Michigan

Abstract

Abstract BACKGROUND: It is estimated that 40% to 60% of patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) continue to experience symptoms despite adequate medical management. For this population of treatment-refractory patients, promising results have been reported with the use of deep brain stimulation (DBS). OBJECTIVE: To conduct a systematic review of the literature and develop evidence-based guidelines on DBS for OCD. METHODS: A systematic literature search was undertaken using the PubMed database for articles published between 1966 and October 2012 combining the following words: “deep brain stimulation and obsessive-compulsive disorder” or “electrical stimulation and obsessive-compulsive disorder.” Of 353 articles, 7 were retrieved for full-text review and analysis. The quality of the articles was assigned to each study and the strength of recommendation graded according to the guidelines development methodology of the American Association of Neurological Surgeons/Congress of Neurological Surgeons Joint Guidelines Committee. RESULTS: Of the 7 studies, 1 class I and 2 class II double-blind, randomized, controlled trials reported that bilateral DBS is more effective in improving OCD symptoms than sham treatment. CONCLUSION: Based on the data published in the literature, the following recommendations can be made: (1) There is Level I evidence, based on a single class I study, for the use of bilateral subthalamic nucleus DBS for the treatment of medically refractory OCD. (2) There is Level II evidence, based on a single class II study, for the use of bilateral nucleus accumbens DBS for the treatment of medically refractory OCD. (3) There is insufficient evidence to make a recommendation for the use of unilateral DBS for the treatment of medically refractory OCD.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Neurology (clinical),Surgery

Reference33 articles.

Cited by 85 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3