Effect of Presenting Hemorrhage on Outcome after Microsurgical Resection of Brain Arteriovenous Malformations

Author:

Lawton Michael T.1,Du Rose1,Tran Mary Nelson2,Achrol Achal S.3,McCulloch Charles E.4,Johnston S Claiborne5,Quinnine Nancy J.3,Young William L.6

Affiliation:

1. Department of Neurological Surgery, Center for Cerebrovascular Research, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California

2. Center for Cerebrovascular Research, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California

3. Department of Anesthesia and Perioperative Care, Center for Cerebrovascular Research, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California

4. Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California

5. Departments of Neurology, and Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California

6. Departments of Anesthesia and Perioperative Care, Neurological Surgery, and Neurology, Center for Cerebrovascular Research, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California

Abstract

Abstract OBJECTIVE: We hypothesized that patients with unruptured arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) at presentation have an increased risk of deterioration compared with patients with ruptured AVMs. METHODS: A consecutive series of 224 patients treated microsurgically by a single neurosurgeon during a period of 6.4 years was analyzed. Initial hemorrhagic presentation was the primary predictor variable. Neurological outcomes were assessed by use of the Modified Rankin Scale (MRS) and Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS), and logistic regression identified predictors of deterioration at follow-up (mean duration, 1.3 yr) relative to baseline before any intervention. RESULTS: Overall, 120 patients (54%) presented with hemorrhage, and all 224 patients underwent microsurgical resection. Complete resection was achieved in 220 patients (98%). According to GOS score, 13 patients (5.8%) deteriorated; according to MRS score, 45 patients (20.1%) deteriorated. Fifteen patients (6.7%) died. Hemorrhagic presentation was associated with improved outcomes, with a mean change in MRS score of +0.89 in patients with ruptured AVMs and −0.38 in patients with unruptured AVMs (P < 0.001). The final mean MRS scores in patients with unruptured AVMs were better than those in patients with ruptured AVMs (1.44 versus 1.90; P = 0.048). Presentation with an unruptured AVM was a predictor of worsening MRS score (odds ratio, 2.33; 95% confidence interval, 1.3–4.3; P = 0.006) but not of worsening GOS score. CONCLUSION: Presentation with AVM hemorrhage is an underappreciated predictor of outcome after therapy that includes microsurgical resection. Patients with ruptured AVMs tended to have deficits at presentation and generally improved after surgery, whereas patients with unruptured AVMs tended to have normal or nearly normal neurological function at presentation and were susceptible to worsening, albeit slight, as measured by MRS scores. Sensitive outcome measures such as MRS detect subtle symptoms and impairments missed by coarser measures such as GOS. Patients should be counseled that the risks associated with elective resection of unruptured AVMs may be higher than recognized previously. Hemorrhagic brain injury and its secondary effects may mask this surgical morbidity.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Neurology (clinical),Surgery

Reference28 articles.

1. What determines the risk of hemorrhage from cerebral arteriovenous malformations?;Alleyne,1999

2. Arteriovenous malformations of the brain in adults;Anonymous;N Engl J Med,1999

3. Cerebral arteriovenous malformations: Considerations for and experience with surgical treatment in 166 cases;Drake;Clin Neurosurg,1979

4. Arteriovenous malformations;Fleetwood;Lancet,2002

5. Surgical management of supratentorial arteriovenous malformation;Fritsch,2004

Cited by 144 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3