Using a National Health Care Data Base To Determine Surgical Complications in Community Hospitals: Lumbar Discectomy as an Example

Author:

Ramirez Lincoln F.1,Thisted Ronald2

Affiliation:

1. Department of Neurosurgery, University of Wisconsin, and Middleton Veterans Administration Hospitals, Madison, Wisconsin

2. Department of Statistics, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois

Abstract

Abstract To determine the incidence of acute complications of an operation in a large cross-section of U.S. community hospitals, we developed a method that combines the screening of discharge abstracts with the sampling of medical records. Our target patients were those who underwent discectomy for routine lumbar discogenic radiculopathy. We assembled 39,389 discharge abstracts of patients who underwent lumbar discectomy in the U.S. in 1980. This population contained some nontarget patients with a) errors in principal diagnosis or procedure, b) operations exceeding two levels, c) fusion, d) previous laminectomy, or e) problems of the lumbar spine in excess of routine disc disease. Screening of discharge abstracts allowed us to exclude some of these patients. Those remaining were then divided by the reported hospitalization into three groups: 1) death, 2) nonfatal complication, and 3) normal hospitalization. A sample of patients from each group was selected for detailed study, and questionnaires were mailed to hospital medical records departments to confirm the hospitalization and to obtain other medical information unavailable in the abstract. With this information, we 1) removed the remaining nontarget patients a through e above); 2) categorized reported complications as erroneous, preexistent, trivial or major; 3) calculated the incidence of major complications; and 4) assessed the reliability of the discharge abstract data. Principal diagnosis and procedure were reliably coded in 96.5% of abstracts. No deaths were reported in error and none were excluded in error. Among patients who had complications, 4% of the abstracts incorrectly indicated complications, and 11% omitted one complication while correctly reporting others. Among the abstracts reporting a normal hospitalization, 0.7% omitted a complication. The abstract data had a 62% sensitivity and a 99% specificity for complications. Based on a final clean population of 28,395 patients, the incidence of death (per 10,000) was 5.9, and that of serious complication was 157.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Clinical Neurology,Surgery

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3