Comparison of the Infratentorial and Transtentorial Approaches to the Pineal Region

Author:

Reid William S.1,Clark Kemp W.1

Affiliation:

1. Division of Neurosurgery. University of Texas Health Science Center, Dallas, Texas

Abstract

Abstract During the past 10 years, two different operative approaches to the pineal region have been recommended by different authors. Numerous reports have appeared in the literature, indicating the safe use of one or the other of these two techniques for the excision of masses in the pineal region. This paper reports experience with both techniques in the treatment of 15 patients with mass lesions in this area. Four patients underwent a supracerebellar infratentorial approach and 11 patients underwent an occipital transtentorial approach to the pineal region. These two approaches are compared in terms of anatomical exposure, technical difficulties, and real or potential complications. The authors prefer the occipital transtentorial approach in dealing with lesions in the pineal region.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Clinical Neurology,Surgery

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3